Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
Published on: November 12, 2016
Mean Value Ensemble Hubbard-U Correction for Spin-Crossover Molecules
Angel Albavera-Mata1,2, S B Trickey1,3, Richard G Hennig1,2
1Center for Molecular Magnetic Quantum Materials, Quantum Theory Project, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida32611, United States.
Accurate spin-crossover energy calculations require Hubbard-U corrections. A new method using ensemble averages for U values improves accuracy for high-throughput screening of spin-crossover molecules.
Area of Science:
- Computational Chemistry
- Materials Science
- Quantum Chemistry
Background:
- High-throughput screening of spin-crossover (SCO) molecules necessitates accurate electronic structure calculations.
- Common density functional approximations often require Hubbard U corrections for accurate modeling of SCO phenomena.
- Existing methods for determining U values, such as linear response on pure spin states, can lead to overcorrection of SCO energies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a more accurate method for calculating Hubbard U values for spin-crossover molecules.
- To improve the accuracy of spin-crossover energy calculations in high-throughput screening.
- To establish a set of recommended averaged U values for practical applications.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a linearly mixed ensemble average spin state as the reference configuration for linear response calculations of U.
- Validated the proposed method on a standard set of spin-crossover complexes.
- Employed a generalized gradient approximation (GGA) exchange-correlation functional.
Main Results:
- Ensemble-averaged U values were consistently smaller than those calculated from pure spin states (low- or high-spin).
- Adiabatic crossover energies calculated with the ensemble U method were closer to the expected target energy range.
- Identified similar U corrections for complexes with the same transition metal and oxidation state.
Conclusions:
- The ensemble average spin state approach effectively resolves the overcorrection issue in Hubbard U calculations for SCO.
- This methodology provides more accurate adiabatic crossover energies compared to conventional U values.
- A set of recommended averaged U values is proposed for efficient high-throughput SCO calculations.
More Related Videos
12:11Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
Published on: April 8, 2020
10:52Line Shape Analysis of Dynamic NMR Spectra for Characterizing Coordination Sphere Rearrangements at a Chiral Rhenium Polyhydride Complex
Published on: July 27, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling