Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Covalent Labeling with Diethylpyrocarbonate for Studying Protein Higher-Order Structure by Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 15, 2021
Protein complex prediction using Rosetta, AlphaFold, and mass spectrometry covalent labeling
Zachary C Drake1, Justin T Seffernick1, Steffen Lindert2
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, US.
This study introduces a hybrid computational method combining AlphaFold and Rosetta with covalent labeling data to determine protein complex structures. The approach significantly improves the accuracy of structural models, aiding in distinguishing native-like protein complexes.
Area of Science:
- Structural biology
- Computational chemistry
- Biophysics
Background:
- Covalent labeling (CL) coupled with mass spectrometry is an analytical technique for studying protein-protein complex structures.
- Existing CL data is often sparse, limiting its ability to unambiguously determine protein structures.
- Computational algorithms are necessary to interpret CL data for structural elucidation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a hybrid computational method for determining protein-protein complex structures using covalent labeling data.
- To assess the accuracy and effectiveness of the integrated approach in distinguishing native-like models.
Main Methods:
- A hybrid method was developed, integrating AlphaFold-generated protein complex subunit models with differential covalent labeling data.
- The method employed CL-guided protein-protein docking within the Rosetta computational framework.
- A benchmark set of protein complexes was used to evaluate the performance of the developed method.
Main Results:
- The integrated approach, utilizing CL data, achieved a root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) below 3.6 Å for 5 out of 5 benchmark complexes.
- In contrast, models generated without CL data only achieved this level of quality for 1 out of 5 complexes.
- The results demonstrate a significant improvement in structural model accuracy when incorporating CL data.
Conclusions:
- The developed hybrid method successfully leverages covalent labeling experimental data to enhance the accuracy of protein-protein complex structure determination.
- This integrated approach effectively distinguishes between native-like and non-native-like structural models.
- The findings highlight the utility of combining computational modeling with experimental data for advancing structural biology.
More Related Videos
10:01Combining Chemical Cross-linking and Mass Spectrometry of Intact Protein Complexes to Study the Architecture of Multi-subunit Protein Assemblies
Published on: November 28, 2017
08:04A New Approach for the Comparative Analysis of Multiprotein Complexes Based on 15N Metabolic Labeling and Quantitative Mass Spectrometry
Published on: March 13, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Mass Spectrometry: Complex Analysis
GC–MS is a powerful hyphenated method commonly used in forensics and environmental...
Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts
The SCF ubiquitin ligase is a protein complex of five individual proteins. This complex attaches ubiquitin to other target proteins to mark them for degradation. In order...
Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry
This technique helps gather information regarding the protein from which the peptide was obtained and to study the peptides’ amino acid sequence. Identifying peptides from a complex mixture is an important component of the growing field of...