Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025
Evaluation of Capillary and Other Vessel Contribution to Macular Perfusion Density Measured with Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
Published on: February 18, 2022
Clinically Significant Nonperfusion Areas on Widefield OCT Angiography in Diabetic Retinopathy
Kentaro Kawai1, Tomoaki Murakami1, Yuki Mori1
1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Purpose:
To investigate the distribution of clinically significant nonperfusion areas (NPAs) on widefield OCT angiography (OCTA) images in patients with diabetes.
Design:
Prospective, cross-sectional, observational study.
Participants:
One hundred and forty-four eyes of 114 patients with diabetes.
Methods:
Nominal 20 × 23 mm OCTA images were obtained using a swept-source OCTA device (Xephilio OCT-S1), followed by the creation of en face images 20-mm (1614 pixels) in diameter centering on the fovea. The nonperfusion squares (NPSs) were defined as the 10 × 10 pixel squares without retinal vessels, and the ratio of eyes with the NPSs to all eyes in each square was referred to as the NPS ratio. The areas with probabilistic differences (APD) for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (APD[PDR] and APD[NPDR]) were defined as sets of squares with higher NPS ratios in eyes with PDR and NPDR, respectively. The P ratio (NPSs within APD[PDR] but not APD[NPDR]/all NPSs) was also calculated.
Main Outcome Measures:
The probabilistic distribution of the NPSs and the association with diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity.
Results:
The NPSs developed randomly in eyes with mild and moderate NPDR and were more prevalent in the extramacular areas and the temporal quadrant in eyes with severe NPDR and PDR. The APD(PDR) was distributed mainly in the extramacular areas, sparing the areas around the vascular arcades and radially peripapillary capillaries. The APD(PDR) contained retinal neovascularization more frequently than the non-APD(PDR) (P = 0.023). The P ratio was higher in eyes with PDR than in those with NPDR (P < 0.001). The multivariate analysis designated the P ratio (odds ratio, 8.293 × 107; 95% confidence interval, 6.529 × 102-1.053 × 1013; P = 0.002) and the total NPSs (odds ratio, 1.002; 95% confidence interval, 1.001-1.003; P < 0.001) as independent risk factors of PDR. Most eyes with NPDR and 4-2-1 rule findings of DR severity had higher P ratios but not necessarily greater NPS numbers.
Conclusions:
The APD(PDR) is uniquely distributed on widefield OCTA images, and the NPA location patterns are associated with DR severity, independent of the entire area of NPAs.
Financial Disclosures:
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
