Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Association between Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index and Masked Uncontrolled Hypertension in Hypertensive Patients: A
Ning Wang1,2, Ying Guo1,2, Xueting Li1,3
1Heart Center and Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Insights
Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), a measure of arterial stiffness, is an independent risk factor for masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH). High CAVI in hypertensive patients with normal office blood pressure indicates a need for ambulatory BP monitoring to detect MUCH.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Biology
- Hypertension Research
Background:
- Masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH), normal office BP with elevated ambulatory BP, is challenging to detect.
- Arterial stiffness, assessed by cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), is a key hypertension risk marker.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between CAVI and MUCH in hypertensive patients.
- To determine if CAVI can serve as an early indicator for MUCH.
Main Methods:
- 155 hypertensive patients underwent office BP and ambulatory BP monitoring.
- Patients were categorized into controlled hypertension (CH), MUCH, and sustained uncontrolled hypertension (SUCH) groups.
- CAVI measurements were compared across groups, and logistic regression was used for analysis.
Main Results:
- Both MUCH and SUCH groups exhibited significantly higher CAVI than the CH group (p=0.017 and p=0.002, respectively).
- Increased CAVI was independently associated with the presence of MUCH and SUCH (OR 2.046, p=0.005; OR 2.215, p=0.003).
- No significant difference in CAVI was found between MUCH and SUCH groups.
Conclusions:
- CAVI is an independent risk factor for MUCH, comparable in importance to sustained uncontrolled hypertension.
- High CAVI in hypertensive patients with normal office BP warrants further ambulatory BP monitoring for MUCH detection.
- CAVI shows potential as a noninvasive tool for early identification of patients with MUCH.
Abstract:
Detection of masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) that was defined for treated hypertensive individuals who had normal office blood pressure (BP) but elevated ambulatory BP remains largely challenging. Arterial stiffness is one of the leading risk markers for hypertension and can be clinically assessed by the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI). This study aimed to evaluate the association between CAVI and MUCH. A total of 155 hypertensive patients were included with their office BP levels and ambulatory BP monitoring measurements, which were divided into controlled hypertension (CH), MUCH, and sustained uncontrolled hypertension (SUCH) groups, respectively. There were 48 patients with CH, 56 patients with MUCH, and 51 patients with SUCH. Both MUCH and SUCH groups had a significantly higher CAVI than the CH group (9.05 (8.20-9.91) vs. 8.33 (7.75-9.15), p = 0.017, and 9.75 (8.35-10.50) vs. 8.33 (7.75-9.15), p = 0.002, respectively). There was no significant difference in CAVI values between the MUCH and SUCH groups. Multinomial logistic regression analysis exhibited that compared with the CH group, increased CAVI levels were positively associated with the presence of MUCH and SUCH (OR 2.046, 95% CI (1.239-3.381), p = 0.005; OR 2.215, 95% CI (1.310-3.747), p = 0.003) after adjusting for confounders. However, there was a similar trend of the CAVI in the MUCH and SUCH groups (OR 0.924, 95% CI (0.629-1.356), p = 0.686). In summary, our findings support, for the first time, the novel notion that CAVI as an arterial stiffness parameter is an independent risk factor for MUCH, being equally important to MUCH and SUCH. When the assessed CAVI is high in hypertensive patients with normotensive office BP levels, it is necessary to further investigate with a 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring to estimate the longstanding BP control. CAVI may be used as a noninvasive indicator to identify patients with MUCH earlier.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Hypertension I: Introduction
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Hypertension V: Nursing Management

