Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025

11:21
Robotic Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: May 29, 2015
19.7K
Very high-power short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation utilizing a very-close protocol-the FAST AND
Christian-H Heeger1,2, Makoto Sano1,3, Sorin Ștefan Popescu1
1Department of Rhythmology, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Lübeck D-23538, Germany.
Summary
Very high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation using a very-close protocol offers a safe and effective pulmonary vein isolation. This method significantly reduces procedure and ablation times while showing promising long-term durability.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) necessitates effective pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for treatment.
- Conventional ablation protocols have limitations in procedure time and efficacy.
- Very high-power short-duration (vHP-SD) radiofrequency ablation offers a novel approach to PVI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vHP-SD ablation for PVI using an individualized 'very-close protocol'.
- To compare the outcomes of vHP-SD PVI with a very-close protocol against standard ablation techniques.
Main Methods:
- Fifty patients with symptomatic AF underwent PVI using vHP-SD with a very-close protocol (3-4 mm anterior, 5-6 mm posterior inter-lesion distance).
- Outcomes were compared to a control group of 50 patients treated with an ablation-index-guided strategy.
- Key metrics included RF time, procedure duration, first-pass isolation rate, adverse events, 12-month recurrence-free survival, and PVI durability.
Main Results:
- The vHP-SD group demonstrated significantly shorter mean RF time (352 ± 81 s vs. 1657 ± 570 s) and procedure duration (59 ± 13 min vs. 101 ± 38 min) compared to the control group.
- First-pass isolation rates were comparable (74% vs. 76%).
- PVI durability assessed during redo procedures was significantly higher in the vHP-SD group (75% vs. 33%).
Conclusions:
- Pulmonary vein isolation solely utilizing vHP-SD via a very-close protocol is safe and effective.
- This approach results in significantly reduced procedure and ablation times.
- Promising 12-month follow-up and PVI durability support the potential of this technique.

