Adagrasib with or without Cetuximab in Colorectal Cancer with Mutated KRAS G12C

Rona Yaeger1, Jared Weiss1, Meredith S Pelster1

  • 1From the Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (R.Y.); Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.W.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (M.S.P.); Virginia Cancer Specialists, NEXT Oncology-Virginia, Fairfax (A.I.S.); US Oncology Research, the Woodlands (A.I.S.), and Mary Crowley Cancer Research, Dallas (M.B.) - both in Texas; the University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange (S.-H.I.O.), and Mirati Therapeutics, San Diego (J.G.C., K.V., T.K., H.D.-T.) - all in California; the Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (T.A.L.); Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (T.S.B.-S.); Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (C.P.P., G.A.H.), and the Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (S.J.K.) - both in Boston.

Abstract

Insights

Adagrasib showed antitumor activity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer harboring KRAS G12C mutations. Combining adagrasib with cetuximab improved response rates and duration compared to adagrasib alone.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Research
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Adagrasib, an oral small-molecule inhibitor targeting mutant KRAS G12C, demonstrates clinical activity in pretreated patients with various cancers, including colorectal cancer.
  • Preclinical data suggest that combining KRAS G12C inhibitors with epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies may enhance clinical efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of adagrasib monotherapy versus adagrasib in combination with cetuximab in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer with KRAS G12C mutation.

Main Methods:

  • A phase 1-2, open-label, nonrandomized clinical trial assigned patients to receive adagrasib monotherapy or adagrasib plus intravenous cetuximab.
  • Primary endpoints included objective response rate (complete or partial response) and safety assessment.

Main Results:

  • In the adagrasib monotherapy group (43 evaluable patients), the objective response rate was 19%, with a median progression-free survival of 5.6 months.
  • In the combination therapy group (28 evaluable patients), the objective response rate was 46%, with a median progression-free survival of 6.9 months and a median response duration exceeding 6 months.
  • Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 34% of the monotherapy group and 16% of the combination therapy group, with no grade 5 events.

Conclusions:

  • Adagrasib exhibits antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with KRAS G12C-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer, both as monotherapy and in combination with cetuximab.
  • Combination therapy with adagrasib and cetuximab demonstrated a higher response rate and longer response duration compared to adagrasib monotherapy.
  • Reversible adverse events were common, and the combination regimen was generally well-tolerated.