Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes02:58

Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes

27.1K
Crystal Field Theory
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
27.1K
Metal-Ligand Bonds02:51

Metal-Ligand Bonds

21.3K
The hemoglobin in the blood, the chlorophyll in green plants, vitamin B-12, and the catalyst used in the manufacture of polyethylene all contain coordination compounds. Ions of the metals, especially the transition metals, are likely to form complexes.
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
21.3K
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes02:46

Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes

43.7K
Tetrahedral Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
43.7K
Trends in Lattice Energy: Ion Size and Charge02:54

Trends in Lattice Energy: Ion Size and Charge

24.1K
An ionic compound is stable because of the electrostatic attraction between its positive and negative ions. The lattice energy of a compound is a measure of the strength of this attraction. The lattice energy (ΔHlattice) of an ionic compound is defined as the energy required to separate one mole of the solid into its component gaseous ions. For the ionic solid sodium chloride, the lattice energy is the enthalpy change of the process:
24.1K
Bonding in Metals02:32

Bonding in Metals

47.7K
Metallic bonds are formed between two metal atoms. A simplified model to describe metallic bonding has been developed by Paul Drüde called the “Electron Sea Model”. 
47.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optical spectra of plasmonic Au clusters and nanoparticles obtained using the TDDFT+<i>U</i> method.

Nanoscale·2026
Same author

Vacancy-driven twinning in metal nanoparticles: from bulk morphology transformation to optical and electrochemical effects.

Nanoscale·2026
Same author

Correlation-driven charge migration triggered by infrared multi-photon ionization.

Chemical science·2025
Same author

Orbital magnetism through inverse Faraday effect in metal clusters.

Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany)·2024
Same author

Optical spectra of silver clusters and nanoparticles from 4 to 923 atoms from the TDDFT+U method.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Crucial Role of Conjugation in Monolayer-Protected Metal Clusters with Aromatic Ligands: Insights from the Archetypal Au<sub>144</sub>L<sub>60</sub> Cluster Compounds.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2021
Same journal

Localization and delocalization of defect states in 2D polyaramid with carbon and nitrogen vacancies.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same journal

The impact of macrocyclization: electronic structures and excited state dynamics of pillar[4]arene[1]quinone.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same journal

Tuning the transport properties of penta-graphene nanoribbons.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same journal

High-throughput screening of M-based layered compounds as solid-state electrolytes for chloride-ion batteries.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same journal

Lower bound of the capacitance of constant phase elements based on electrochemical impedance spectra.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same journal

Stability constants of lanthanide-nitrate complexes in aqueous solutions: a theoretical study.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Energy Dispersive X-ray Tomography for 3D Elemental Mapping of Individual Nanoparticles
10:00

Energy Dispersive X-ray Tomography for 3D Elemental Mapping of Individual Nanoparticles

Published on: July 5, 2016

11.9K

Visualizing screening in noble-metal clusters: static vs. dynamic.

Rajarshi Sinha-Roy1,2,3,4, Pablo García-González5,4, Xóchitl López-Lozano6

  • 1Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, CINAM, Marseille 13288, France. hans-christian.weissker@univ-amu.fr.

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics : PCCP
|December 22, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Localized surface-plasmon resonance in metal nanoparticles involves electron oscillations. This study compares dynamic plasmonic screening with static electric field screening in noble-metal clusters.

More Related Videos

Fixed Target Serial Data Collection at Diamond Light Source
06:19

Fixed Target Serial Data Collection at Diamond Light Source

Published on: February 26, 2021

3.3K
Achieving Efficient Fragment Screening at XChem Facility at Diamond Light Source
08:35

Achieving Efficient Fragment Screening at XChem Facility at Diamond Light Source

Published on: May 29, 2021

5.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Energy Dispersive X-ray Tomography for 3D Elemental Mapping of Individual Nanoparticles
10:00

Energy Dispersive X-ray Tomography for 3D Elemental Mapping of Individual Nanoparticles

Published on: July 5, 2016

11.9K
Fixed Target Serial Data Collection at Diamond Light Source
06:19

Fixed Target Serial Data Collection at Diamond Light Source

Published on: February 26, 2021

3.3K
Achieving Efficient Fragment Screening at XChem Facility at Diamond Light Source
08:35

Achieving Efficient Fragment Screening at XChem Facility at Diamond Light Source

Published on: May 29, 2021

5.6K

Area of Science:

  • Condensed matter physics
  • Materials science
  • Nanotechnology

Background:

  • Localized surface-plasmon resonance (LSPR) in metal nanoparticles arises from collective oscillations of quasi-free electrons.
  • The d electrons in noble metals can screen the surface plasmon, affecting its behavior.
  • Noble-metal clusters exhibit high metallic character, effectively screening static external electric fields.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the induced electron densities resulting from LSPR with those from static electric fields.
  • To elucidate the fundamental differences between dynamic and static screening mechanisms in metallic systems.
  • To provide an intuitive understanding of electron behavior in response to different electromagnetic stimuli.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical modeling of electron density responses in metal nanoparticles and clusters.
  • Comparison of electron density distributions under LSPR conditions versus static electric field application.
  • Analysis of d-electron polarization effects in both dynamic and static screening scenarios.

Main Results:

  • Distinct representations of induced electron densities were generated for LSPR and static electric field cases.
  • The screening mechanisms differ significantly between the dynamic plasmon resonance and static field interactions.
  • D-electron polarization plays a crucial role in modulating the screening effects in both scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a clear comparison of dynamic and static screening in noble-metal nanostructures.
  • Understanding these differences is key to controlling and utilizing plasmonic phenomena.
  • The findings offer insights into the electronic properties and responses of metallic nanoparticles and clusters.