Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
Published on: February 3, 2023
Variation in mutational (co)variances
François Mallard1, Luke Noble1, Charles F Baer2
1Institut de Biologie de l'École Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR 8197, Inserm U1024, F-75005 Paris, France.
Mutational pleiotropy influences trait evolution. Researchers found that while mutation accumulation in Caenorhabditis elegans showed significant mutational variance, differences between genotypes were not detectable, suggesting short-term selection doesn't shape the M matrix.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary genetics
- Quantitative genetics
- Developmental biology
Background:
- Pleiotropy, where mutations affect multiple traits, is a key factor in evolutionary processes.
- Understanding mutational variances and covariances (M matrix) is crucial for predicting phenotypic divergence.
- Previous studies have not fully elucidated how M matrices differ across genotypes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate and compare the M matrices for locomotion behavior traits in two Caenorhabditis elegans genotypes.
- To investigate whether the M matrix varies between genotypes after mutation accumulation.
- To compare the M matrix with the G matrix (standing genetic covariances) of a domesticated lab population.
Main Methods:
- Mutation accumulation (MA) lines were generated in two Caenorhabditis elegans genotypes over 250 generations.
- The M matrix, describing mutational variances and covariances for six locomotion traits, was estimated for each genotype.
- The estimated M matrices were compared to each other and to the G matrix of a lab-domesticated population.
Main Results:
- Significant mutational variance was detected in the M matrices for locomotion traits.
- No detectable differences were found in the size or orientation of the M matrices between the two genotypes.
- The M matrices differed significantly from the G matrix, with smaller genetic covariances due to pleiotropy compared to linkage disequilibrium in the lab population.
Conclusions:
- Short-term mutation accumulation (250 generations) may be insufficient to reveal genotype-specific differences in the M matrix.
- Selection does not appear to shape the M matrix for locomotion behavior in the short term.
- Hybridization of genotypes in a lab population may facilitate selection on new phenotypic dimensions of locomotion behavior.
Related Concept Videos
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
Genetic Variation
Genes exist in different versions called alleles,...
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Spontaneous and Induced Mutations
Mutations
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...

