Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing
Published on: August 25, 2018
The importance of what we cannot observe: Experimental limitations as a source of bias for meta-regression models in
Alberto Garre1, Marcel H Zwietering1, Heidy M W den Besten1
1Food Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700, AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Abstract:
Meta-regression models have gained in popularity during the last years as a way to create more generic models for Microbial Risk Assessments that also include variability. However, as with most meta-analyses and empirical models, systematic biases in the data can result in inaccurate models. In this article, we define experimental bias as a type of selection bias due to the practical limitations of microbial inactivation experiments. Conditions with extremely high D-values (i.e. slow inactivation) need very long experimental runs to cause significant reductions. On the other hand, when the D-value is extremely low, not enough data points can be gathered before the microbial population is below the detection limit. Consequently, experimental designs favour conditions within a practical experimental range, introducing a selection bias in the D-values. We demonstrate the impact of experimental bias in meta-regression models using numerical simulations. Models fitted to data with experimental bias overestimated the z-value and underestimated variability. We propose a rapid heuristic method to identify experimental bias in datasets, and we propose truncated regression to mitigate its impact in meta-regression models. Both methods were validated using simulated data. Thereafter the procedures were tested by building a meta-regression model for actual data for the inactivation of Bacillus cereus spores. We concluded that the dataset included experimental bias, and that it would cause an overestimation of the microbial resistance at high temperatures (>120 °C) for classical meta-regression models. This effect was mitigated when the model was built using truncated regression. In conclusion, we demonstrate that experimental bias could potentially result in inaccurate models for predictive microbiology. Therefore, checking for experimental bias should be a routine step in meta-regression modelling, and be included in guidelines on data analysis for meta-regression.
More Related Videos
08:14A Method to Define the Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Colon Microbiome Biodiversity in a Mouse Colon Tumor Model
Published on: February 28, 2018
09:17A Robust Pneumonia Model in Immunocompetent Rodents to Evaluate Antibacterial Efficacy against S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii
Published on: January 2, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Regression Toward the Mean