Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Surgical versus Interventional Treatment of Concomitant Aortic Valve Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease
Ahmed Elderia1, Stephen Gerfer1, Kaveh Eghbalzadeh1
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Cologne, Heart Center, Cologne, Germany.
Insights
Staged percutaneous coronary intervention and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (PCI+TAVI) offers short-term survival benefits over combined coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement (CABG+AVR) for patients with coronary artery disease and aortic stenosis. However, PCI+TAVI is associated with increased risks of atrioventricular block and paravalvular leak.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) and aortic valve stenosis (AS) frequently coexist.
- Treatment involves surgical (CABG+AVR) or interventional (PCI+TAVI) approaches.
- Short-term outcomes of these strategies require comparative analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare short-term outcomes of CABG+AVR versus staged PCI+TAVI in patients with CAD and AS.
- To evaluate mortality, reintervention rates, and complications.
- To inform treatment decisions for this complex patient population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of patients treated since 2017.
- Identification of 237 patients undergoing PCI+TAVI and 241 patients undergoing CABG+AVR.
- Propensity score matching to create 101 balanced pairs for comparison.
Main Results:
- The PCI+TAVI group was older (81.4 vs 71.9 years) and had lower 30-day mortality (1.0% vs 4.9%) after matching.
- CABG+AVR required more rethoracotomies (7.9% vs 2%) but fewer pacemakers (4.1% vs 6.9%).
- PCI+TAVI showed a higher incidence of moderate-to-severe paravalvular leak (PVL) (4.9% vs 0%).
Conclusions:
- Staged PCI+TAVI offers a short-term survival advantage compared to combined CABG+AVR.
- PCI+TAVI is associated with a higher risk of atrioventricular block and PVL.
- Long-term outcome data from further trials are necessary.
Background:
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is frequently diagnosed in patients with aortic valve stenosis. Treatment options include surgical and interventional approaches. We therefore analyzed short-term outcomes of patients undergoing either coronary artery bypass grafting with simultaneous aortic valve replacement (CABG + AVR) or staged percutaneous coronary intervention and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (PCI + TAVI).
Methods:
From all patients treated since 2017, we retrospectively identified 237 patients undergoing TAVI within 6 months after PCI and 241 patients undergoing combined CABG + AVR surgery. Propensity score matching was performed, resulting in 101 matched pairs.
Results:
Patients in the CABG + AVR group were younger compared with patients in the PCI + TAVI group (71.9 ± 4.9 vs 81.4 ± 3.6 years; p < 0.001). The overall mortality at 30 days before matching was higher after CABG + AVR than after PCI + TAVI (7.8 vs 2.1%; p = 0.012). The paired cohort was balanced for both groups regarding demographic variables and the risk profile (age: 77.2 ± 3.7 vs78.5 ± 2.7 years; p = 0.141) and EuroSCORE II (6.2 vs 7.6%; p = 0.297). At 30 days, mortality was 4.9% in the CABG + AVR group and 1.0% in the PCI + TAVI group (p = 0.099). Rethoracotomy was necessary in 7.9% in the CABG + AVR, while conversion to open heart surgery was necessary in 2% in the PCI + TAVI group. The need for new pacemaker was lower after CABG + AVR than after PCI + TAVI (4.1 vs 6.9%; p = 0.010). No paravalvular leak (PVL) was noted in the CABG + AVR group, while the incidence of moderate-to-severe PVL after PCI + TAVI was 4.9% (p = 0.027).
Conclusion:
A staged interventional approach comprises a short-term survival advantage compared with combined surgery for management of CAD and aortic stenosis. However, PCI + TAVI show a significantly higher risk of atrioventricular block and PVL. Further long-term trials are warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Angina IV: Management

