Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Verbal Lie Detection: Its Past, Present and Future.
Aldert Vrij1, Pär Anders Granhag2, Tzachi Ashkenazi3,4
1Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2DY, UK.
This review explores verbal lie detection, from early word analysis to modern content analysis tools like Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) and interview protocols. It highlights how neuroscience can enhance deception detection accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Forensic Science
- Linguistics
Background:
- Verbal lie detection research originated in the 1970s, focusing on the link between deception and specific word usage.
- Key developments include Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA), Reality Monitoring (RM), and Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN) as veracity assessment tools.
- The mid-2000s saw the rise of 'Interviewing to deception' with protocols designed to elicit verbal cues.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of verbal lie detection research.
- To examine the methodologies, theoretical underpinnings, and effectiveness of various lie detection techniques.
- To explore the potential contributions of neuroscience to improving verbal lie detection.
Main Methods:
- Review of historical and contemporary research in verbal lie detection.
- Analysis of content analysis tools: Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA), Reality Monitoring (RM), and Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN).
- Examination of interview protocols: Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE), Verifiability Approach (VA), Cognitive Credibility Assessment (CCA), and Reality Interviewing (RI).
Main Results:
- Established verbal criteria tools (CBCA, RM, SCAN) offer methods for veracity assessment.
- Interview protocols (SUE, VA, CCA, RI) aim to enhance the detection of deception through specific questioning strategies.
- Significant differences and similarities exist between these various content analysis and interview approaches.
Conclusions:
- Verbal lie detection has progressed from simple word analysis to sophisticated content analysis and interview techniques.
- Understanding the nuances of these methods is crucial for accurate veracity assessment.
- Neuroscience holds promise for advancing the field of verbal lie detection by providing new insights and improving existing methods.
Related Concept Videos
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
Hindsight Biases
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

