Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

False Memories01:18

False Memories

130
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
130
Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

146
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
146
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.5K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

6.7K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
6.7K
Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports01:26

Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports

796
Telephone and Verbal Reports in healthcare settings are two communication methods for conveying therapeutic instructions from healthcare providers to nurses or other healthcare staff.
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders
796
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

1.9K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impacts of physical and testimonial evidence on South Korean Police interrogator's selection of tactics.

Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law·2026
Same author

Temporal changes in mechanical pin prick sensitivity following high frequency induced sensitisation of central nociceptive pathways: A test re-test reliability study.

The journal of pain·2026
Same author

Assessing lying about opinions through extending the devil's advocate interview protocol with a same example statement.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

Unilateral online ultrasound stimulation of early visual cortex suppresses responses to contralateral visual stimuli.

Brain stimulation·2026
Same author

ARTEM-IS for ERP: Agreed Reporting Template for EEG Methodology-International Standard for Event-Related Potential Experiments.

Psychophysiology·2025
Same author

The Segmented Interview: Partitioning the Initial Free Recall Topics into Segments to Enhance Information Gathering and Lie Detection.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 16, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.6K

Verbal Lie Detection: Its Past, Present and Future.

Aldert Vrij1, Pär Anders Granhag2, Tzachi Ashkenazi3,4

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2DY, UK.

Brain Sciences
|December 23, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This review explores verbal lie detection, from early word analysis to modern content analysis tools like Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) and interview protocols. It highlights how neuroscience can enhance deception detection accuracy.

Keywords:
cognitive credibility assessmentcriteria-based content analysisfMRI lie detectionreality interviewingreality monitoringscientific content analysisstrategic use of evidenceverbal lie detection

More Related Videos

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.5K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 16, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.6K
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.5K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Forensic Science
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • Verbal lie detection research originated in the 1970s, focusing on the link between deception and specific word usage.
  • Key developments include Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA), Reality Monitoring (RM), and Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN) as veracity assessment tools.
  • The mid-2000s saw the rise of 'Interviewing to deception' with protocols designed to elicit verbal cues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of verbal lie detection research.
  • To examine the methodologies, theoretical underpinnings, and effectiveness of various lie detection techniques.
  • To explore the potential contributions of neuroscience to improving verbal lie detection.

Main Methods:

  • Review of historical and contemporary research in verbal lie detection.
  • Analysis of content analysis tools: Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA), Reality Monitoring (RM), and Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN).
  • Examination of interview protocols: Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE), Verifiability Approach (VA), Cognitive Credibility Assessment (CCA), and Reality Interviewing (RI).

Main Results:

  • Established verbal criteria tools (CBCA, RM, SCAN) offer methods for veracity assessment.
  • Interview protocols (SUE, VA, CCA, RI) aim to enhance the detection of deception through specific questioning strategies.
  • Significant differences and similarities exist between these various content analysis and interview approaches.

Conclusions:

  • Verbal lie detection has progressed from simple word analysis to sophisticated content analysis and interview techniques.
  • Understanding the nuances of these methods is crucial for accurate veracity assessment.
  • Neuroscience holds promise for advancing the field of verbal lie detection by providing new insights and improving existing methods.