Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Isolation01:24

DNA Isolation

39.7K
DNA isolation protocols can be fast and straightforward or complex and time-consuming depending on the type and quality of DNA required for further processing. For example, plasmid DNA extraction is a bit more complicated than genomic DNA extraction because of the need for an appropriate lysis method to separate plasmid DNA from gDNA during isolation. However, for specific applications, such as long-range DNA sequencing that require a good yield of high- quality DNA samples, we need to follow...
39.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Microbiota-based biomarkers of infection risk in patients undergoing vascular endograft implantation: a pilot study.

Frontiers in medicine·2025
Same author

Cross-disciplinary awareness of healthcare associated infections (HAIs): insights from a university-wide survey.

Frontiers in medicine·2025
Same author

Advancing Forensic Human Chronological Age Estimation: Biochemical, Genetic, and Epigenetic Approaches from the Last 15 Years: A Systematic Review.

International journal of molecular sciences·2025
Same author

Hand-to-surface bacterial transfer and healthcare-associated infections prevention: a pilot study on skin microbiome in a molecular biology laboratory.

Frontiers in medicine·2025
Same author

Estimation of Human Chronological Age from Buccal Swab Samples through a DNA Methylation Analysis Approach of a Five-Locus Multiple Regression Model.

International journal of molecular sciences·2024
Same author

Defining medical liability when artificial intelligence is applied on diagnostic algorithms: a systematic review.

Frontiers in medicine·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence
11:49

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence

Published on: March 9, 2015

15.8K

Touch DNA Sampling Methods: Efficacy Evaluation and Systematic Review.

Pamela Tozzo1, Enrico Mazzobel1, Beatrice Marcante1

  • 1Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Legal Medicine Section, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences
|December 23, 2022
PubMed
Summary

The single-swab method is most effective for recovering touch DNA from crime scenes. This research compares sampling techniques, finding that double-swab and other methods do not improve biological material recovery rates.

Keywords:
crime sceneforensic geneticsgenetic profilesystematic reviewtouch DNA

More Related Videos

Simple and Rapid Method to Obtain High-quality Tumor DNA from Clinical-pathological Specimens Using Touch Imprint Cytology
11:20

Simple and Rapid Method to Obtain High-quality Tumor DNA from Clinical-pathological Specimens Using Touch Imprint Cytology

Published on: March 21, 2018

11.0K
Application of DNA Fingerprinting using the D1S80 Locus in Lab Classes
08:35

Application of DNA Fingerprinting using the D1S80 Locus in Lab Classes

Published on: July 17, 2021

20.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence
11:49

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence

Published on: March 9, 2015

15.8K
Simple and Rapid Method to Obtain High-quality Tumor DNA from Clinical-pathological Specimens Using Touch Imprint Cytology
11:20

Simple and Rapid Method to Obtain High-quality Tumor DNA from Clinical-pathological Specimens Using Touch Imprint Cytology

Published on: March 21, 2018

11.0K
Application of DNA Fingerprinting using the D1S80 Locus in Lab Classes
08:35

Application of DNA Fingerprinting using the D1S80 Locus in Lab Classes

Published on: July 17, 2021

20.5K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Touch DNA analysis is vital in criminal investigations.
  • Optimal biological material recovery methods for touch DNA remain debated.
  • Current literature lacks conclusive evidence on the most effective sampling technique.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current considerations for touch DNA sampling.
  • To compare the efficiency of single-swab, double-swab, and other sampling methods.
  • To identify limitations in current touch DNA recovery procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review of experimental results.
  • Comparative analysis of three distinct sampling strategies: single-swab, double-swab, and "other methods" (cutting, tape, FTA® paper).
  • Evaluation of DNA recovery rates across various experimental conditions.

Main Results:

  • The single-swab method demonstrated superior efficiency in DNA recovery across diverse settings.
  • Double-swab techniques and alternative methods did not yield significantly improved recovery rates.
  • Identified inherent limitations within the investigated sampling procedures.

Conclusions:

  • The single-swab technique appears to be the most effective for touch DNA recovery.
  • Findings suggest a need to re-evaluate standard operating procedures in forensic laboratories.
  • Optimizing sampling methods can enhance the probative value of touch DNA evidence.