Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025

11:54
Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
Published on: March 13, 2017
9.4K
Analysis of Signal Processing Methods to Reject the DC Offset Contribution of Static Reflectors in FMCW Radar-Based
Marco Mercuri1, Tom Torfs2, Maxim Rykunov2
1Dipartimento di Informatica, Modellistica, Elettronica e Sistemistica (DIMES), University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 23, 2022
Summary
This study compares DC offset calibration methods for frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar vital signs monitoring. Geometric fitting is best for millimeter wave (mmWave) sensors, while linear demodulation excels below 10 GHz for accurate respiration and heart rate detection.
Area of Science:
- Electromagnetics and Signal Processing
- Biomedical Engineering
- Wireless Health Monitoring
Background:
- Frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radars offer innovative wireless solutions for remote vital signs monitoring (respiration and heart rates).
- Static reflectors in FMCW radar systems introduce unwanted direct current (DC) offset, distorting vital signs data and reducing measurement accuracy.
- Accurate vital signs monitoring necessitates effective removal of DC offset for proper phase demodulation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze and compare various DC offset calibration methods for FMCW radar vital signs monitoring.
- To determine the optimal DC offset calibration method for maximizing accuracy in physiological parameter measurement across different transmitting frequencies.
- To evaluate the performance of these methods in a realistic office environment using subjects.
Main Methods:
- Utilized two FMCW radar systems operating below 10 GHz and at millimeter wave (mmWave) frequencies.
- Applied four distinct DC offset calibration techniques to baseband radar signals derived from cardiopulmonary activities.
- Experimentally assessed the accuracy of each method by measuring respiration and heart rates of multiple subjects.
Main Results:
- Linear demodulation demonstrated superior performance for vital signs monitoring with FMCW radars operating below 10 GHz.
- Geometric fitting emerged as the most accurate method for mmWave FMCW radar vital signs monitoring.
- The choice of DC offset calibration method significantly impacts the accuracy of remote vital signs measurement.
Conclusions:
- The optimal DC offset calibration strategy for FMCW radar vital signs monitoring is frequency-dependent.
- Linear demodulation is recommended for sub-10 GHz systems, while geometric fitting is preferred for mmWave systems.
- Effective DC offset calibration is crucial for reliable and accurate remote physiological monitoring using FMCW radar technology.
Keywords:
DC offset calibrationDopplerFMCWheart ratemmWavephase demodulationremote radar sensingrespiration ratesub-10 GHz radarvital signs monitoring
