Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinicians' fallacies in psychiatric practice.

J S Werner1, L E Gibbs

  • 1Adult Health Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire.

Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services
|August 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measurement of the [Formula: see text] cross section in pp collisions at [Formula: see text] TeVand limits on anomalous gauge couplings.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2017
Same author

Forward-backward asymmetry of Drell-Yan lepton pairs in pp collisions at [Formula: see text][Formula: see text].

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2017
Same author

Measurement of the [Formula: see text] production cross section in the all-jets final state in pp collisions at [Formula: see text][Formula: see text].

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2016
Same author

Measurement of differential cross sections for Higgs boson production in the diphoton decay channel in pp collisions at [Formula: see text].

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2016
Same author

Study of B Meson Production in p+Pb Collisions at √[S(NN)]=5.02 TeV Using Exclusive Hadronic Decays.

Physical review letters·2016
Same author

Measurement of the differential cross section for top quark pair production in pp collisions at [Formula: see text].

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
Same journal

Addressing Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Perioperative Settings: An Evidence-Based Approach to Improve Outcomes.

Journal of psychosocial nursing and mental health services·2026
Same journal

"You Focus Only on Your Breath and Heart": Experiences of Individuals With Mental Disorders Participating in Nurse-Led Group Yoga Practice in an Inpatient Psychiatric Unit.

Journal of psychosocial nursing and mental health services·2026
Same journal

The Mediating Role of Relationship-Related Cognitive Distortion on Depression and Perceived Loneliness in Older Adults: A Comparative Study.

Journal of psychosocial nursing and mental health services·2026
Same journal

Depressive Symptoms, Fear of Falling, and the Case for Integrated Mental Health Interventions in Geriatric Care: Breaking the Cycle.

Journal of psychosocial nursing and mental health services·2026
Same journal

Resilience Building and Enhancing Mental Health: A Scoping Review of School-to-University Programs.

Journal of psychosocial nursing and mental health services·2026
Same journal

Relationships Among Women's Adverse Childhood Experiences, Attachment Styles, and Psychological Well-Being and Cinderella Syndrome.

Journal of psychosocial nursing and mental health services·2026
See all related articles

This study identifies eleven common clinicians' fallacies in interdisciplinary psychiatric treatment. Recognizing these cognitive errors is crucial for improving patient care and ensuring evidence-based decision-making by treatment teams.

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Healthcare Management

Background:

  • Interdisciplinary psychiatric treatment relies on effective collaboration and sound clinical judgment.
  • Cognitive biases and logical fallacies can significantly impair decision-making within treatment teams.
  • Previous literature has not comprehensively addressed common fallacies specifically within psychiatric interdisciplinary contexts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and describe eleven prevalent clinicians' fallacies encountered in interdisciplinary psychiatric treatment.
  • To underscore the negative impact of these fallacies on patient well-being and treatment integrity.
  • To advocate for clinician education on fallacies to promote evidence-based reasoning.

Main Methods:

  • A qualitative review of common cognitive and logical fallacies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of clinical experience within interdisciplinary psychiatric settings.
  • Descriptive presentation of eleven identified fallacies.

    • Main Results:

    • Eleven distinct and commonly observed clinicians' fallacies in psychiatric interdisciplinary settings were described.
    • These fallacies were identified as leading to erroneous treatment decisions.
    • The potential for these fallacies to negatively impact patients, families, and treatment teams was highlighted.

    Conclusions:

    • Awareness and understanding of clinicians' fallacies are essential for all members of interdisciplinary psychiatric teams.
    • Educating teams about these fallacies can mitigate diagnostic and treatment errors.
    • Promoting critical thinking and reliance on empirical evidence over emotional appeals is vital for patient safety and effective psychiatric care.