Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Inspecting molecular aggregate quadratic vibronic coupling effects using squeezed coherent states
Mantas Jakučionis1, Agnius Žukas1, Darius Abramavičius1
1Institute of Chemical Physics, Vilnius University, Sauletekio Ave. 9-III, LT-10222, Vilnius, Lithuania. darius.abramavicius@ff.vu.lt.
Abstract:
We present a systematic comparison of three quantum mechanical approaches describing excitation dynamics in molecular complexes using the time-dependent variational principle (TDVP) with increasing sophistication trial wavefunctions (ansatze): Davydov D2, squeezed D2 (sqD2) and a numerically exact multiple D2 (mD2) ansatz in order to characterize validity of the sqD2 ansatz. Numerical simulations of molecular aggregate absorption and fluorescence spectra with intra- and intermolecular vibrational modes, including quadratic electronic-vibrational (vibronic) coupling term, which is due to vibrational frequency shift upon pigment excitation are presented. Simulated absorption and fluorescence spectra of a J type molecular dimer with high frequency intramolecular vibrational modes obtained with D2 and sqD2 ansatze match the spectra of mD2 ansatz only in the single pigment model without quadratic vibronic coupling. In general, the use of mD2 ansatz is required to model an accurate dimer and larger aggregate's spectra. For a J dimer aggregate coupled to a low frequency intermolecular phonon bath, absorption and fluorescence spectra are qualitatively similar using all three ansatze. The quadratic vibronic coupling term in both absorption and fluorescence spectra manifests itself as a lineshape peak amplitude redistribution, static frequency shift and an additional shift, which is temperature dependent. Overall the squeezed D2 model does not result in a considerable improvement of the simulation results compared to the simplest Davydov D2 approach.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

