Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Construction and validation of the Oxford Neurodevelopment Assessment (OX-NDA) in 1-year-old Brazilian children
Michelle Fernandes1,2,3, Diego Bassani4,5, Elaine Albernaz6
1MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre and Human Development & Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. m.c.fernandes@soton.ac.uk.
Insights
The Oxford Neurodevelopment Assessment (OX-NDA) shows moderate agreement with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development III (BSID-III) for identifying infants at risk of cognitive and motor delays. This rapid, low-cost tool is suitable for low- and middle-income countries.
Area of Science:
- Global child development
- Pediatric neurodevelopmental assessment
- Low- and middle-income country (LMIC) health interventions
Background:
- Over 250 million children globally face developmental delay risk before age five.
- Early identification and intervention in the first two years are crucial for lasting positive effects.
- Limited availability of infant development assessments for LMIC settings poses a significant challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce the Oxford Neurodevelopment Assessment (OX-NDA), a novel tool for assessing 1-year-old children.
- To evaluate the OX-NDA's performance against the established Bayley Scales of Infant Development III (BSID-III).
- To determine the psychometric properties of the OX-NDA for use in LMIC contexts.
Main Methods:
- The OX-NDA was developed considering 16 international infant development tools.
- Agreement with BSID-III was assessed using intra-class correlations, Bland-Altman analyses, and sensitivity/specificity in 104 Brazilian infants.
- Reliability was evaluated using Cohen's kappas (inter-rater) and Cronbach's alphas (internal consistency).
Main Results:
- Moderate agreement (ICC 0.63-0.68) was found for cognitive and motor outcomes between OX-NDA and BSID-III.
- Low agreement (ICC 0.30) was observed for language outcomes.
- The OX-NDA demonstrated high inter-rater and test-retest reliability and required less than 20 minutes for administration.
Conclusions:
- The OX-NDA offers moderate accuracy for identifying infants at risk of cognitive and motor delays, with lower accuracy for language delays.
- It is a rapid, cost-effective assessment designed for LMIC populations.
- Further research is recommended to validate the OX-NDA across diverse populations and for language delay identification in Brazil.
Background:
Over 250 million children under 5 years, globally, are at risk of developmental delay. Interventions during the first 2 years of life have enduring positive effects if children at risk are identified, using standardized assessments, within this window. However, identifying developmental delay during infancy is challenging and there are limited infant development assessments suitable for use in low- and middle-income (LMIC) settings. Here, we describe a new tool, the Oxford Neurodevelopment Assessment (OX-NDA), measuring cognition, language, motor, and behaviour, outcomes in 1-year-old children. We present the results of its evaluation against the Bayley Scales of Infant Development IIIrd edition (BSID-III) and its psychometric properties.
Methods:
Sixteen international tools measuring infant development were analysed to inform the OX-NDA's construction. Its agreement with the BSID-III, for cognitive, motor and language domains, was evaluated using intra-class correlations (ICCs, for absolute agreement), Bland-Altman analyses (for bias and limits of agreement), and sensitivity and specificity analyses (for accuracy) in 104 Brazilian children, aged 12 months (SD 8.4 days), recruited from the 2015 Pelotas Birth Cohort Study. Behaviour was not evaluated, as the BSID-III's adaptive behaviour scale was not included in the cohort's protocol. Cohen's kappas and Cronbach's alphas were calculated to determine the OX-NDA's reliability and internal consistency respectively.
Results:
Agreement was moderate for cognition and motor outcomes (ICCs 0.63 and 0.68, p < 0.001) and low for language outcomes (ICC 0.30, p < 0.04). Bland-Altman analysis showed little to no bias between measures across domains. The OX-NDA's sensitivity and specificity for predicting moderate-to-severe delay on the BSID-III was 76, 73 and 43% and 75, 80 and 33% for cognition, motor and language outcomes, respectively. Inter-rater (k = 0.80-0.96) and test-rest (k = 0.85-0.94) reliability was high for all domains. Administration time was < 20 minutes.
Conclusion:
The OX-NDA shows moderate agreement with the BSID-III for identifying infants at risk of cognitive and motor delay; agreement was low for language delay. It is a rapid, low-cost assessment constructed specifically for use in LMIC populations. Further work is needed to evaluate its use (i) across domains in populations beyond Brazil and (ii) to identify language delays in Brazilian children.
More Related Videos
11:29Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
11:14A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants
Published on: October 4, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Introduction to Developmental Psychology