Nonconsensual Condom-Use Deception: An Empirically Based Conceptualization of Stealthing.

Area of Science:

• Public Health
• Sociology
• Sexuality Studies

Background:

• Nonconsensual condom removal (NCCR), termed stealthing, is an emerging concern in sexual violence research.
• Existing literature lacks a unified conceptual framework for understanding stealthing.
• Stealthing represents a breach of sexual consent and has significant implications for public health.

Purpose of the Study:

• To conduct a rapid review of empirical research on stealthing.
• To explore terminological and conceptual challenges associated with stealthing.
• To propose a new, comprehensive term and definition for the behavior.

Main Methods:

• Rapid review of articles from Web of Science, Medline, and PsycINFO.
• Inclusion of studies reporting empirical data on stealthing (excluding legal responses).
• Analysis of 16 selected articles in English, French, Italian, or Spanish.

Main Results:

• Over 10% of women report experiencing stealthing in their lifetime.
• Stealthing is also experienced by men who have sex with men.
• Identified terminological inconsistencies and conceptual gaps in current research.

Conclusions:

• A new term, nonconsensual condom-use deception, is proposed for a more comprehensive understanding.
• A revised definition and categorization based on consent breach, practices, and motivation are suggested.
• Research, policy, and practice require a conceptual framework informed by survivor experiences.