Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025

An Educational Video Demonstration of How to Prone a Critically Ill Intubated Patient
Published on: November 30, 2022
COVID-19 Lessons Learned: Response to the Anticipated Ventilator Shortage
Richard D Branson1, Dario Rodriquez2
1Division of Trauma/Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. richard.branson@uc.edu.
Early COVID-19 ventilator shortages were driven by inaccurate predictions, leading to over 200,000 ventilators purchased. Most were not valuable, highlighting a critical shortage of trained staff for mechanical ventilation.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Public Health Policy
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic triggered widespread concern over potential ventilator shortages.
- Inaccurate predictions of patient needs fueled an urgent, global search for mechanical ventilators.
- Initial responses focused on acquiring existing ventilators and exploring novel solutions like shared ventilation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the miscalculations and flawed decision-making processes during the early COVID-19 pandemic regarding ventilator procurement and utilization.
- To identify key areas for improvement in future public health crisis preparedness for respiratory support.
- To evaluate the effectiveness and value of the large-scale ventilator purchases made during the pandemic.
Main Methods:
- Review of initial pandemic response strategies and ventilator acquisition efforts.
- Analysis of the rationale behind emergency use authorizations for ventilation equipment and techniques.
- Examination of the actual need for ventilators versus the procured quantities and their clinical utility.
Main Results:
- Over 200,000 ventilators were acquired by various entities in the US, often with limited clinical value for COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS).
- The concept of shared ventilation was pursued, but often misunderstood as a simple engineering problem rather than a complex physiological challenge.
- The most significant and persistent shortage identified was not of equipment, but of trained personnel to operate mechanical ventilators.
Conclusions:
- The pandemic response was hampered by unrealistic demand forecasts and a focus on equipment over expertise.
- Significant financial resources were expended on ventilators that proved to have little utility for the intended patient population.
- Future preparedness must prioritize training and resource allocation for skilled healthcare professionals in critical care ventilation.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:

