Intrafetal Laser Therapy Is a Feasible Treatment for Different Fetal Conditions: A Systematic Review
Isabella Fabietti1, Chiara Vassallo2, Domenico Umberto De Rose3
1Medical and Surgical Department of Fetus - Newborn - Infant, Fetal Medicine and Surgery Unit, "Bambino Gesù" Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Introduction:
Over the past years, intrafetal laser (IFL) therapy has been increasingly used in the management of various prenatal conditions. The aim of our research was to clarify the effectiveness and safety of this technique.
Methods:
A systematic review of the literature was carried out using MEDLINE/PubMed over a period of 20 years (2001-2021).
Results:
A total of forty-one articles were selected in the literature search, including 194 cases of twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence, 56 cases of bronchopulmonary sequestrations (BPSs), 5 cases of placental chorioangiomas (PCA), 11 cases of sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT), and 103 cases of embryo reduction (ER) managed using IFL. In TRAP sequence, perfusion of the acardiac twin was successfully disrupted in all cases. However, preterm premature rupture of membranes (P-PROMs) occurred in 6 out of 79 pregnancies (7.5%), and preterm birth (PTB) occurred in 36 out of 122 pregnancies (29.5%). In BPS, IFL was successfully performed in all cases with no significant fetal-maternal complications. The rates of P-PROM and PTB were, respectively, 3.2% and 12.5%. All PCA IFL-treated cases resulted in successful pregnancy outcomes; no cases of P-PROM were reported, but the rate of PTB reached a peak of 60% due to complications such as severe fetal growth restriction and fetal Doppler abnormalities. In SCT cases, complete cessation of blood flow was achieved in 4 patients (36.4%); P-PROM occurred in 2 cases (18.2%), whereas the rate of PTB was 87.5%. In ER, no intraoperative or major maternal complications were described in the literature. Rates of miscarriage and PTB differed between initial trichorionic triamniotic and dichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancies.
Conclusion:
Our analysis suggests that IFL is a safe and feasible technique for the management of different fetal conditions. However, the overall risk of PTB, and its related morbidity and mortality, ranges from 12.5% in BPS to 87.5% in SCT IFL-treated cases. This information could aid in decision-making during prenatal counseling. However, final perinatal outcome depends on the severity of the disease itself.
