Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Published on: June 7, 2015
Interfractional dose accumulation for MR-guided liver SBRT: Variation among algorithms is highly patient- and
Isak Wahlstedt1, Abraham George Smith2, Claus Erik Andersen3
1Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Anker Engelunds Vej 1, Bygning 101A, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet (RH), Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte (HGH), Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 7, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.
Background And Purpose:
Daily plan adaptations could take the dose delivered in previous fractions into account. Due to high dose delivered per fraction, low number of fractions, steep dose gradients, and large interfractional organ deformations, this might be particularly important for liver SBRT. This study investigates inter-algorithm variation of interfractional dose accumulation for MR-guided liver SBRT.
Materials And Methods:
We assessed 27 consecutive MR-guided liver SBRT treatments of 67.5 Gy in three (n = 15) or 50 Gy in five fractions (n = 12), both prescribed to the GTV. We calculated fraction doses on daily patient anatomy, warped these doses to the simulation MRI using seven different algorithms, and accumulated the warped doses. Thus, we obtained differences in planned doses and warped or accumulated doses for each algorithm. This enabled us to calculate the inter-algorithm variations in warped doses per fraction and in accumulated doses per treatment course.
Results:
The four intensity-based algorithms were more consistent with planned PTV dose than affine or contour-based algorithms. The mean (range) variation of the dose difference for PTV D95% due to dose warping by these intensity-based algorithms was 10.4 percentage points (0.3 to 43.7) between fractions and 8.6 (0.3 to 24.9) between accumulated treatment doses. As seen by these ranges, the variation was very dependent on the patient and the fraction being analyzed. Nevertheless, no correlations between patient or plan characteristics on the one hand and inter-algorithm dose warping variation on the other hand was found.
Conclusion:
Inter-algorithm dose accumulation variation is highly patient- and fraction-dependent for MR-guided liver SBRT. We advise against trusting a single algorithm for dose accumulation in liver SBRT.
More Related Videos
08:54Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Published on: May 8, 2018
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022