Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Preclinical Model of Hind Limb Ischemia in Diabetic Rabbits
Published on: June 2, 2019
Growth factor for therapeutic angiogenesis in ischemic heart disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Ling Tan1, Lin-Zi Long1, Hong-Zheng Li1,2
1Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Insights
Growth factor (GF) therapy for therapeutic angiogenesis shows short-term benefits for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in ischemic heart disease (IHD). However, it did not significantly reduce mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), or revascularization rates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Regenerative Medicine
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Ischemic heart disease (IHD) remains a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide.
- Therapeutic angiogenesis using growth factors (GFs) has been explored as a treatment strategy to improve myocardial perfusion.
- The efficacy and safety of GF therapy in IHD patients require systematic evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate the effects of growth factor (GF) therapy for therapeutic angiogenesis on outcomes in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD).
- To pool data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the impact of GF therapy on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), angina class, mortality, and cardiovascular events.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs were conducted using data from PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases up to October 2022.
- Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool.
- Meta-analysis, meta-regression, and publication bias analyses were performed to evaluate GF therapy's effects on LVEF, Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class, all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and revascularization.
Main Results:
- Twenty-nine studies with 2899 IHD patients were included in the meta-analysis.
- GF therapy did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality (RR: 0.82), MACE (RR: 0.83), or revascularization rates (RR: 1.27) compared to control.
- GF therapy showed a significant benefit in increasing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during short-term follow-up (<1 year).
Conclusions:
- Growth factor therapy for therapeutic angiogenesis demonstrates a short-term benefit in improving LVEF in IHD patients.
- The current evidence does not support the efficacy of GF therapy in reducing long-term outcomes such as all-cause mortality, MACE, or the need for revascularization.
Abstract:
Aim: This study was designed to systematically evaluate the effects of growth factor (GF) for therapeutic angiogenesis on ischemic heart disease (IHD) by pooling the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods and Results: PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched from inception to October 2022. RCTs, investigating the effects of GF therapy on IHD, were included. The risk bias of included study was assessed according to Cochrane tool. Weighted mean difference (WMD), calculated with fixed effect model or random effect model, was used to evaluate the effects of GF therapy on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class. Relative risk (RR) was used to evaluate the effects of GF therapy on all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and revascularization. Meta-analysis, meta-regression analysis and publication bias analysis were performed by RevMan 5.3 or Stata 15.1 software. Twenty-nine studies involving 2899 IHD patients (1,577 patients in GF group and 1,322 patients in control group) were included. Compared with the control group, GF therapy did not reduce all-cause mortality (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.54-1.24; p = 0.341), MACE [(RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.61-1.12; p = 0.227), revascularization (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.82-1.96, p = 0.290) and CCS angina class (WMD: -0.08, 95% CI: -0.36 to 0.20, p = 0.560). However, GF therapy could increase LVEF during short-term follow-up (<1 year). Conclusion: GF for therapeutic angiogenesis was beneficial for increasing LVEF during short-term follow-up (<1 year), however, the therapy was not efficacious in decreasing all-cause mortality, MACE and revascularization.
Related Concept Videos
Regulation of Angiogenesis and Blood Supply
Mechanism of Angiogenesis

