Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

125
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
125
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

5.3K
It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
5.3K
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

8.9K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
8.9K
Bootstrapping01:24

Bootstrapping

658
The term "bootstrap" originated in the 19th century as a metaphor for self-improvement or achieving something independently, without external assistance. This concept extends to statistical bootstrapping, a self-contained method for estimating population parameters through resampling, even though it can be computationally intensive. Developed by the American statistician Dr. Bradley Efron in 1979, bootstrapping provides a robust way to perform inference when the original sample size is...
658
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.2K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.2K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.9K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Νovel methylation biomarkers in liquid biopsy and classifying biosignatures for the clinical management of breast cancer.

Breast cancer research : BCR·2026
Same author

MicroRNA Expression Analysis and Biological Pathways in Chemoresistant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Cancers·2025
Same author

Classification of non-TCGA cancer samples to TCGA molecular subtypes using compact feature sets.

Cancer cell·2025
Same author

BRCA1 & BRCA2 methylation as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in cancer: Implementation in liquid biopsy in the era of precision medicine.

Clinical epigenetics·2024
Same author

The HUNT lung-SNP model: genetic variants plus clinical variables improve lung cancer risk assessment over clinical models.

Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology·2024
Same author

Promising microRNAs in pre-diagnostic serum associated with lung cancer up to eight years before diagnosis: a HUNT study.

Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers
10:29

Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers

Published on: March 21, 2016

12.4K

Don't lose samples to estimation.

Ioannis Tsamardinos1,2,3

  • 1Computer Science Department, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.

Patterns (New York, N.Y.)
|December 26, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Avoid losing data in predictive modeling by estimating pipeline performance, not specific model instances. This approach maximizes data usage, especially crucial for small datasets, ensuring robust model evaluation.

More Related Videos

An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience
10:56

An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience

Published on: April 13, 2019

7.3K
The Optical Fractionator Technique to Estimate Cell Numbers in a Rat Model of Electroconvulsive Therapy
07:55

The Optical Fractionator Technique to Estimate Cell Numbers in a Rat Model of Electroconvulsive Therapy

Published on: July 9, 2017

11.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers
10:29

Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers

Published on: March 21, 2016

12.4K
An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience
10:56

An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience

Published on: April 13, 2019

7.3K
The Optical Fractionator Technique to Estimate Cell Numbers in a Rat Model of Electroconvulsive Therapy
07:55

The Optical Fractionator Technique to Estimate Cell Numbers in a Rat Model of Electroconvulsive Therapy

Published on: July 9, 2017

11.7K

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Traditional predictive modeling reserves a test set, reducing available data for model training.
  • This data loss is particularly problematic in low-sample-size scenarios, compromising model robustness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an alternative methodology for estimating predictive model performance without sacrificing data.
  • To address the limitations of traditional test set usage in predictive modeling.

Main Methods:

  • Shift focus from evaluating a single model instance to evaluating the entire model-producing pipeline.
  • Utilize cross-validation techniques where the pipeline is trained on subsets of the data to estimate performance.
  • Incorporate corrections for the 'winner's curse' when comparing multiple pipelines.

Main Results:

  • The proposed pipeline-centric evaluation method avoids data loss to estimation, preserving all samples for final model training.
  • Performance estimation is achieved by repeatedly training the pipeline on data subsets, providing a more reliable out-of-sample estimate.
  • The approach ensures that the final operational model is trained on the maximum available data.

Conclusions:

  • Estimating pipeline performance is a more data-efficient strategy than traditional test set holdout, especially for small datasets.
  • This methodology enhances the utility of all available data for building the final predictive model.
  • Further considerations are needed for selecting among multiple pipelines to avoid biased performance estimates.