Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Classification and Outcomes of 214 Periprosthetic Patellar Fractures in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Design and validation of a biomechanics device for preclinical arthrofibrosis models.

Bone & joint research·2026
Same author

Disparities in Preoperative Weight Loss and Obesity Treatment Before Total Joint Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Select Femoral Revisions Without an Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy Demonstrated Excellent 10-Year Survivorship in Over 600 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Surrogate End Points Are Associated With Favorable Results in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Randomized Controlled Trials.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Contemporary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Sequelae of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: 15-Year Outcomes of 165 Cases.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 16, 2025

A Minimally Invasive Model to Analyze Endochondral Fracture Healing in Mice Under Standardized Biomechanical Conditions
06:41

A Minimally Invasive Model to Analyze Endochondral Fracture Healing in Mice Under Standardized Biomechanical Conditions

Published on: March 22, 2018

8.3K

How to Develop and Validate Prediction Models for Orthopedic Outcomes.

Isabella Zaniletti1, Dirk R Larson2, David G Lewallen3

  • 1Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.

The Journal of Arthroplasty
|December 26, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This paper explains how to build and validate prediction models for arthroplasty surgery. Properly developed models can aid surgical decisions and improve patient outcomes.

Keywords:
arthroplastymachine learningmodel validationorthopedicspredictorsrisk prediction

More Related Videos

A Mouse Model of Orthopedic Surgery to Study Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Tissue Regeneration
08:17

A Mouse Model of Orthopedic Surgery to Study Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Tissue Regeneration

Published on: February 27, 2018

16.5K
Establishment of a Segmental Femoral Critical-size Defect Model in Mice Stabilized by Plate Osteosynthesis
06:38

Establishment of a Segmental Femoral Critical-size Defect Model in Mice Stabilized by Plate Osteosynthesis

Published on: October 12, 2016

10.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 16, 2025

A Minimally Invasive Model to Analyze Endochondral Fracture Healing in Mice Under Standardized Biomechanical Conditions
06:41

A Minimally Invasive Model to Analyze Endochondral Fracture Healing in Mice Under Standardized Biomechanical Conditions

Published on: March 22, 2018

8.3K
A Mouse Model of Orthopedic Surgery to Study Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Tissue Regeneration
08:17

A Mouse Model of Orthopedic Surgery to Study Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Tissue Regeneration

Published on: February 27, 2018

16.5K
Establishment of a Segmental Femoral Critical-size Defect Model in Mice Stabilized by Plate Osteosynthesis
06:38

Establishment of a Segmental Femoral Critical-size Defect Model in Mice Stabilized by Plate Osteosynthesis

Published on: October 12, 2016

10.1K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Medical Statistics
  • Clinical Decision Making

Background:

  • Prediction models are widely used in medicine to forecast patient outcomes.
  • Despite their potential, prediction models are underutilized in clinical arthroplasty practice.
  • Robust models can significantly enhance surgical decision-making processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of statistical concepts for prediction models.
  • To outline practical steps for developing and validating these models in arthroplasty research.

Main Methods:

  • Review of statistical concepts relevant to prediction model development.
  • Guidance on practical steps for model construction and validation.

Main Results:

  • Highlights key statistical principles for building reliable prediction models.
  • Offers a framework for validating models within the arthroplasty field.

Conclusions:

  • Well-constructed and validated prediction models are valuable tools for arthroplasty surgeons.
  • Adoption of these models can support informed surgical decision-making and potentially improve patient care.