Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.2K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.2K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

156
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
156
Bias01:22

Bias

4.7K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
4.7K
Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

230
Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
230
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

174
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
174
Archival Research01:40

Archival Research

16.0K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
16.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding of Authorship Guidelines and the Frequency of Authorship Misuse: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study in the State of Qatar.

Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE·2025
Same author

Consciousness and Human Brain Organoids: A Conceptual Mapping of Ethical and Philosophical Literature.

AJOB neuroscience·2025
Same author

Shared decision-making in adolescent healthcare: a literature review of ethical considerations.

European journal of pediatrics·2024
Same author

Taking the risk. A systematic review of ethical reasons and moral arguments in the clinical use of polygenic risk scores.

American journal of medical genetics. Part A·2024
Same author

Mismatch in perceptions of the quality of supervision and research data management as an area of concern: Results from a university-wide survey of the research integrity culture at a Belgian university.

Accountability in research·2024
Same author

Bad apples or systematic problem? Is Italy struggling with maintaining high level of research integrity?

Accountability in research·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.0K

Research Integrity Supervision Practices and Institutional Support: A Qualitative Study.

Daniel Pizzolato1, Kris Dierickx1

  • 1Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.

Journal of Academic Ethics
|December 27, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Research integrity education is crucial, with supervisors playing a key role. Institutions must support supervisors to foster responsible research practices among doctoral students.

Keywords:
Good research practicesInstitutional supportMentorMentorshipResearch integrityResearch supervisorSupervision practices

More Related Videos

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.2K
Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.0K
Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.2K
Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Research integrity
  • Supervision practices
  • Doctoral education

Background:

  • Scientific malpractice often stems from inadequate research integrity education.
  • Research supervisors are vital in translating formal integrity training to doctoral students.
  • Supervision and role modeling significantly impact supervisees' research conduct.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore European research supervisors' perceptions of their role in research integrity training.
  • To investigate supervisors' real-life supervision practices and views on institutional support.
  • To understand how institutional support can enhance responsible research practices.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative study involving interviews with 22 European research supervisors.
  • Exploration of supervisors' perceived roles, practices, and institutional support needs.
  • Analysis of how supervisor characteristics and supervisee learning curves influence mentoring.

Main Results:

  • Supervisors perceive commonalities in their research integrity roles but highlight differences based on academic domain, seniority, country, and gender.
  • Mentoring approaches vary depending on supervisees' learning curves.
  • All interviewed supervisors agreed on the importance of institutional support for their efforts.

Conclusions:

  • Research institutions must actively support supervisors to improve research integrity practices.
  • Understanding variations in supervision is key to developing effective institutional strategies.
  • This study provides a foundation for further research into research integrity supervision.