Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Electroencephalography Network Indices as Biomarkers of Upper Limb Impairment in Chronic Stroke
Published on: July 14, 2023
Psychometric Properties of a New Measure of Upper Limb Performance in Post-Stroke Individuals: Trunk-Based Index of
Daniele Piscitelli1,2,3, Melanie C Baniña1,2, Timothy K Lam4
1School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Background:
Several measures of upper limb (UL) motor tasks have been developed to characterize recovery. However, UL performance and movement quality measures in isolation may not provide a true profile of functional recovery.
Objective:
To investigate the measurement properties of a new trunk-based Index of Performance (IPt) of the UL combining endpoint performance (accuracy and speed) and movement quality (trunk displacement) in stroke.
Methods:
Participants with stroke (n = 25, mean time since stroke: 18.7 ± 17.2 months) performed a reaching task over 3 evaluation sessions. The IPt was computed based on Fitts' Law that incorporated endpoint accuracy and speed corrected by the amount of trunk displacement. Test-retest reliability was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. Standard error of measurement (SEM) and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) were determined. Validity was investigated through the relationship between IPt, Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE), and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), as well as the ability of IPt to distinguish between levels of UL motor impairment severity.
Results:
Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = .908, 95% CI: 0.807-0.96). Bland-Altman did not show systematic differences. SEM and MDC95 were 14% and 39%, respectively. Construct validity was satisfactory. The IPt showed low-to-moderate relationships with FMA-UE (R2 ranged from .236 to .428) and ARAT (R2 ranged from .277 to .306). IPt scores distinguished between different levels of UL severity.
Conclusions:
The IPt showed evidence of good reliability, and initial validity. The IPt may be a promising tool for research and clinical settings. Further research is warranted to investigate its validity with additional comparator instruments.
More Related Videos
15:00The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors
Published on: May 2, 2021
06:25Capturing Representative Hand Use at Home Using Egocentric Video in Individuals with Upper Limb Impairment
Published on: December 23, 2020