Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interference and priming within and across visual fields in a lexical decision task.

M Eglin1

  • 1University of British Columbia, Canada.

Neuropsychologia
|January 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual search performance in the neglect syndrome.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Thermal status of saturation divers during operational dives in the North Sea.

Undersea & hyperbaric medicine : journal of the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, Inc·2002
Same author

A randomised, double-blind comparison of the efficacy and safety of citalopram compared to mianserin in elderly, depressed patients with or without mild to moderate dementia.

International journal of geriatric psychiatry·2000
Same author

Cortical substrates supporting visual search in humans.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·1991
Same author

Cuing efficiency in a Stroop-like task with visual half-field presentation.

Memory & cognition·1990
Same author

The effects of different attentional loads on feature integration in the cerebral hemispheres.

Perception & psychophysics·1987
Same journal

Shared and Culture-Specific Brain Networks for Emotional Facial Discrimination: Evidence from Predictive Modeling.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Exploring the Experiences of Autistic and Non-Autistic Aphantasics: A Qualitative Study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Prevalence and modulation of rat off-track head scanning on linear tracks: possible implications for representational and dynamic properties of hippocampal place cells.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Identifying networks within an fMRI multivariate searchlight analysis.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Modulating sentence comprehension in people with aphasia through anodal tDCS: A double-blind randomized cross-over study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Deficient processing of regularity violations during visuospatial neglect: a visual mismatch negativity study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
See all related articles

This study on visual attention found that while automatic priming showed no lateral differences, filtering information was less efficient when stimuli crossed visual fields. Specifically, right-hemisphere distractors interfered less with left-hemisphere targets.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Hemispheric Asymmetry

Background:

  • Investigating how the brain processes and filters visual information is crucial for understanding attention.
  • Lateralized presentation of stimuli allows for the examination of interhemispheric communication and processing efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate visual selection mechanisms, specifically filtering and automatic priming, across and within visual fields.
  • To determine if there are lateral asymmetries in attentional processing and distractor interference.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a lexical decision task on lower-case target words presented with or without upper-case distractor words.
  • Distractors were presented in the same or opposite visual fields, and were either semantically related or unrelated to the target.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Two selection processes were examined: filtering external targets and automatic priming.

    • Main Results:

    • Automatic priming did not exhibit lateral asymmetry.
    • Filtering was equally efficient within hemispheres but showed strong asymmetry across hemispheres.
    • Unrelated distractors in the right visual field interfered less with left visual field target processing than vice versa.

    Conclusions:

    • Semantic processing of distractors occurred regardless of visual field.
    • Excluding distractor information from task-relevant processing was least costly when presented to the right hemisphere for left-hemisphere processing.
    • Hemispheric asymmetries significantly influence the efficiency of filtering visual information.