Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A simplified method for determining individual growth curve standards.

R L Deter1, I K Rossavik

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Obstetrics and Gynecology
|November 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary

Simplified fetal growth curve standards can be achieved using early ultrasound measurements. Two fetal examinations before 26 weeks

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Can growth in dichorionic twins be monitored with individualized growth assessment?

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2023
Same author

Second-trimester growth velocities in twin and singleton pregnancies.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2022
Same author

Third-trimester growth diversity in small fetuses classified as appropriate-for-gestational age or small-for-gestational age at birth.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2021
Same author

ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2019
Same author

Re: Diagnostic accuracy of individual antenatal tools for prediction of small-for-gestational age at birth. B. Poljak, U. Agarwal, R. Jackson, Z. Alfirevic and A. Sharp. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49: 493-499.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2017
Same author

Re: Prediction of microcephaly at birth using three reference ranges for fetal head circumference: can we improve prenatal diagnosis? Z. Leibovitz, E. Daniel-Spiegel, G. Malinger, K. Haratz, M. Tamarkin, L. Gindes, L. Schreiber, L. Ben-Sira, D. Lev, I. Shapiro, H. Bakry, B. Weizman, A. Zreik, S. Egenburg, A. Arad, R. Tepper, D. Kidron and T. Lerman-Sagie. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47: 586-592.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2016

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Fetal Development
  • Biometry

Background:

  • Accurate individual fetal growth curve standards are crucial for monitoring fetal well-being.
  • Current methods for establishing these standards can be complex and time-consuming.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To simplify the process of obtaining individual fetal growth curve standards.
  • To investigate the use of early fetal growth curve slopes for predicting later growth.

Main Methods:

  • Serial ultrasound examinations of 33 normal fetuses from 15 to 38 weeks' gestational age.
  • Measurements of eight key fetal biometric parameters, including biparietal diameter (BPD) and abdominal circumference.
  • Application of Rossavik growth models and linear regression analysis to estimate growth curve slopes and coefficients.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Strong linear relationships were found between estimated growth curve coefficients (c and s) and early growth curve slopes (R2 = 87.3-98.4% for loge c vs. loge SLOPE1, R2 = 64.9-90.3% for s vs. c).
  • Growth models derived from early slopes accurately predicted fetal measurements after 26 weeks' gestational age.
  • The predictive accuracy was comparable to traditional regression-based models.

Conclusions:

  • Individual fetal growth curve standards for eight anatomic parameters can be reliably determined using data from just two ultrasound examinations before 26 weeks' gestational age.
  • This simplified approach enhances the efficiency of obtaining individualized fetal growth monitoring standards.