Children's consideration of collaboration and merit when making sharing decisions in private

Marie Schäfer1, Daniel B M Haun2, Michael Tomasello3

  • 1Wilhelm Wundt Institute for Psychology, Leipzig University, 04109 Leipzig, Germany.

Insights

Children share resources more fairly after collaborating, especially younger ones. This suggests collaboration fosters a sense of fairness, though merit-based sharing also develops independently.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Young children often share equally when acquiring resources collaboratively.
  • The underlying reasons for this equal sharing are debated: common resource perception versus collaboration-induced fairness.
  • Understanding fairness development in children is crucial for social cognition research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether collaboration itself promotes fairness in resource distribution among young children.
  • To differentiate between fairness driven by collaborative context and fairness based on individual work effort.
  • To examine age-related differences in fairness perceptions and sharing behaviors.

Main Methods:

  • 193 German children (5- and 8-year-olds) participated in resource acquisition tasks.
  • Children either worked individually or collaborated with a peer to obtain resources.
  • Afterward, children privately decided whether to donate resources to a partner with an empty container.

Main Results:

  • Children shared more resources after collaboration than after individual work when efforts were equal.
  • Children shared more with a harder-working partner than a less-working partner, regardless of collaboration.
  • Younger children were more generous than older children, particularly after collaborative tasks.

Conclusions:

  • Collaboration appears to foster a genuine sense of fairness in young children's resource sharing.
  • Merit-based fairness related to work effort can develop independently of collaboration by middle childhood.
  • Findings highlight the complex interplay between collaborative experiences and developing fairness norms.

Related Concept Videos

Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.7K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.9K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
35.1K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.6K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison02:57

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
50.3K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.8K