Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Coronary Artery Revascularization
Published on: September 15, 2023
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus repeat surgical revascularization in patients with prior coronary artery
Arnaldo Dimagli1, Gianmarco Cancelli1, Giovanni Jr Soletti1
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY.
Insights
Repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (RCABG) offers better long-term survival and fewer repeat revascularizations compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with prior bypass surgery. However, PCI demonstrates superior short-term operative outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Surgical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) often require revascularization.
- Optimal treatment strategy between repeat CABG (RCABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for symptomatic patients with prior CABG remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and compare operative and follow-up outcomes of RCABG versus PCI in patients with prior CABG.
- To determine the optimal treatment strategy for this patient population.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing RCABG and PCI in patients with prior CABG.
- Primary outcome: follow-up mortality. Secondary outcomes: repeat revascularization, operative mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction.
- Analysis included aggregated data and individual patient data using restricted mean survival time.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in overall follow-up survival between RCABG and PCI in aggregated analysis.
- Individual patient data analysis revealed a survival benefit for RCABG over PCI (0.7 years).
- PCI showed higher rates of repeat revascularization, while RCABG had lower operative mortality and stroke rates.
Conclusions:
- RCABG is associated with improved long-term survival and reduced need for repeat revascularization in patients with prior CABG.
- PCI offers better operative outcomes, including lower mortality and stroke rates.
- Treatment choice should balance operative risk with long-term benefits.
Objectives:
Repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (RCABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are both used for the treatment of symptomatic patients with coronary artery disease and prior CABG, but the optimal treatment strategy remains unknown. We sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare operative and follow-up outcomes following RCABG versus PCI in patients with prior CABG.
Methods:
Medline and Embase were searched for studies comparing RCABG versus PCI. The primary outcome was follow-up mortality, and secondary outcomes were follow-up repeat revascularization, operative mortality, periprocedural stroke, and myocardial infarction. Time-to-event outcomes were summarized as incidence rate ratios, whereas operative outcomes were summarized as odds ratios. A random effect meta-analysis was performed. Individual patient survival data was extracted from available survival curves and reconstructed using restricted mean survival time.
Results:
Among 2982 articles, 7 studies (9945 patients) were included. In the aggregated data meta-analysis, there was no difference in follow-up survival between RCABG and PCI (incidence rate ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.83-1.25); however, restricted mean survival time analysis of individual data showed a survival benefit for RCABG over PCI (0.7 years; 95% CI, 0.23-1.19 years; P = .004). PCI was found to have a higher incidence rate of follow-up need for repeat revascularization (incidence rate ratio, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.16-2.23), but lower odds for operative mortality and stroke. No difference in the odds for myocardial infarction was found.
Conclusions:
In patients with prior CABG, PCI is associated with better operative outcomes, but RCABG is associated with better survival and freedom from repeat revascularization at follow-up.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

