Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2025

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
Published on: April 8, 2020
Efficient Calculation of NMR Shielding Constants Using Composite Method Approximations and Locally Dense Basis Sets
Jiashu Liang1, Zhe Wang1, Jie Li1
1Kenneth S. Pitzer Center for Theoretical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California94720, United States.
This study efficiently calculates NMR shielding constants using composite methods and locally dense basis sets (LDBS). The pcSseg-n basis sets offer comparable accuracy to pcS-n, reducing computational costs for various molecules.
Area of Science:
- Computational Chemistry
- Quantum Chemistry
- Spectroscopy
Background:
- Accurate calculation of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) shielding constants is crucial for molecular structure elucidation.
- Traditional methods often face high computational costs, limiting their application to larger systems.
- Locally Dense Basis Sets (LDBS) offer a promising approach to improve computational efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate composite method approximations combined with LDBS for calculating NMR shielding constants.
- To compare the performance of different LDBS partition schemes, particularly for density functional theory (DFT) calculations.
- To provide practical recommendations for selecting computational methods based on desired accuracy and time constraints for H, C, N, and O nuclei.
Main Methods:
- Application of composite method approximations with locally dense basis sets (LDBS).
- Assessment of the pcSseg-n series of basis sets against the pcS-n series.
- Evaluation of two distinct LDBS partition schemes for DFT calculations.
- Benchmarking of 99 different computational methods, including conventional electronic structure methods (DFT, wave function) and composite approaches, with and without LDBS, using the NS372 database.
Main Results:
- The pcSseg-n basis sets demonstrate comparable accuracy to pcS-n (for n ≥ 1) with reduced computational expense.
- Two LDBS partition schemes were identified as highly effective for DFT calculations.
- A comprehensive assessment of 99 methods revealed varying performance levels across different accuracy and computational cost requirements.
Conclusions:
- Composite methods combined with LDBS provide an efficient route for calculating NMR shielding constants.
- The pcSseg-n basis sets represent a viable, cost-effective alternative to pcS-n.
- Tailored recommendations are provided for selecting NMR shielding calculation methods based on specific accuracy and resource limitations for key nuclei.
More Related Videos
13:56Probe Type II Band Alignment in One-Dimensional Van Der Waals Heterostructures Using First-Principles Calculations
Published on: October 12, 2019
08:04Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Diamagnetic Shielding of Nuclei: Local Diamagnetic Current
π Electron Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview
¹H NMR: Complex Splitting
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied...
Chemical Shift: Internal References and Solvent Effects
The internal reference compound generally used in NMR spectroscopy is tetramethylsilane (TMS). TMS is preferred because it is chemically inert, soluble in NMR solvents, and easily removable. Also, the highly shielded methyl protons in TMS yield an intense...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule