Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2025

Acupoint Catgut Embedding Therapy in Traditional Chinese Medicine for Managing Allergic Rhinitis
Published on: December 20, 2024
Outcome of childhood epistaxis with treatment of allergic rhinitis: a randomized controlled study
Wan-Yee Teo1,2,3,4, Hwee-Bee Wong5, Gwen Yung Hsin Hwarng6
1Division of Medicine, KK Women's & Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, Singapore. wan-yee.teo@duke-nus.edu.sg.
Insights
Treating allergic rhinitis (AR) in children with nasal steroid spray significantly improves epistaxis outcomes. Combined therapy with antihistamines and nasal steroids yielded the best results for resolving nosebleeds.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Otolaryngology
- Allergy and Immunology
Background:
- Childhood epistaxis frequently co-occurs with allergic rhinitis (AR), causing significant distress.
- No prior studies have investigated epistaxis outcomes following AR treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- Determine if treating AR affects epistaxis outcomes in children.
- Compare the efficacy of three AR treatment regimens on epistaxis.
- Investigate factors in epistaxis pathogenesis associated with AR.
Main Methods:
- A single-blind randomized controlled study of 60 children under 18 with untreated AR and epistaxis.
- Patients received one of three AR treatments: antihistamine, nasal steroid spray, or combination therapy.
- Epistaxis severity and frequency were assessed pre- and post-treatment.
Main Results:
- Nasal steroid spray-containing regimens improved epistaxis outcomes.
- Resolution rates for epistaxis were 20% (antihistamine), 40% (nasal steroid), and 60% (combination).
- Combined therapy showed the best epistaxis resolution at 1-month follow-up; 90% reported nose-picking/rubbing.
Conclusions:
- Intranasal corticosteroids are more effective than oral antihistamines for AR symptoms.
- Intranasal corticosteroids may be crucial for treating epistaxis in AR patients due to digital trauma.
- Findings are relevant for primary care physicians, pediatricians, allergists, and otolaryngologists.
Abstract:
The purpose of this study is to (1) to determine if treatment of underlying allergic rhinitis (AR) in children will affect epistaxis outcome, (2) to compare efficacy of three outpatient AR treatment regimens in epistaxis outcomes, and (3) to investigate potential factors in the pathogenesis of epistaxis with underlying AR. A single-blind randomized-controlled study was conducted in the Otolaryngology clinic in KK Women's and Children's Hospital. Sixty children aged below 18 years with underlying untreated AR, with first presentation of epistaxis, were randomized to three different AR treatments: treatment 1, antihistamine (20 patients); treatment 2, nasal steroid spray (20 patients); and treatment 3, both antihistamine and nasal steroid spray (20 patients). Epistaxis severity and frequency were assessed. Pre-treatment, 95% of patients within each of the three treatment groups described epistaxis symptoms. Post-treatment, there was improvement in epistaxis outcome (resolution of epistaxis) with 20% (4/20), 40% (8/20), and 60% (12/20) of patients in treatment groups 1 (antihistamine), 2 (nasal steroid spray), and 3 (combined therapy) respectively, who reported resolution of epistaxis. Treatment regimens containing nasal steroid spray resulted in greater improvement of epistaxis severity and frequency. Combined therapy (treatment 3) resulted in the best epistaxis outcome at 1-month follow-up. Majority (90%) reported nose-picking/rubbing behavior.
Conclusions:
Intranasal corticosteroids are superior to oral antihistamines in relieving itch or rhinorrhea in AR. Intranasal corticosteroids may be important in treating epistaxis with underlying AR, because digital trauma from itch/rhinorrhea-related nose-picking/rubbing frequently leads to epistaxis. Results from this study will be important to primary and emergency physicians, community pediatricians, and pediatric allergists and otolaryngologists.
What Is Known:
• Childhood epistaxis commonly co-exists with allergic rhinitis (AR), causing significant symptoms and distress to patients. • There are currently no studies reporti ng on epistaxis outcome aft er treatment of underlying AR.
What Is New:
• This is a single-blind randomized-controlled study of 60 children aged below 18 years with underlying untreated AR, with first presentation of epistaxis to a children's hospital in Singapore Patients were randomized to three different regimens to treat AR: treatment 1, antihistamine; treatment 2, nasal steroid spray; and treatment 3, both antihistamine and nasal steroid spray. • Treatment regimens containing nasal steroid spray improved epistaxis outcomes, with combined therapy of antihistamine and nasal steroid spray resulting in the best outcome for resolution of epistaxis among the three treatment regimens.
Related Concept Videos
Epistaxis
Etiology
Possible causes of this condition include high blood pressure, trauma, low humidity, upper respiratory tract infections, allergies, foreign bodies, nasal inhalation of corticosteroids or illicit drugs, excessive use of decongestant nasal sprays, facial or nasal surgery, anatomic malformation, tumors, or systemic...
Drugs Used in Upper Respiratory Disorders: Overview
Antihistamines (e.g., Benadryl) block histamines from binding. Histamines are chemicals released during an allergic reaction in the body. As a...
Drugs Used in Lower Respiratory Disorders: Overview
Bronchodilators, the first step of respiration enhancement, come in various forms, each with its own mechanism...
Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...

