Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2025

Sample Preparation and Experimental Design for In Situ Multi-Beam Transmission Electron Microscopy Irradiation Experiments
Published on: June 27, 2022
Dual- and multi-energy CT for particle stopping-power estimation: current state, challenges and potential
Ming Yang1, Patrick Wohlfahrt2, Chenyang Shen3
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Physics, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Houston, TX 77030, United States of America.
Dual-energy and multi-energy CT scans improve particle therapy accuracy by reducing range uncertainty. These advanced imaging methods offer better estimation of particle stopping power compared to traditional single-energy CT scans.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiotherapy
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Range uncertainty in particle radiotherapy limits its physical potential, primarily due to inaccuracies in estimating particle stopping power (ρ).
- Current methods using single-energy CT (SECT) and Hounsfield look-up tables (HLUT) are sensitive to variations in elemental composition and patient-specific tissue differences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and accelerate the clinical implementation of dual-energy CT (DECT) and multi-energy CT (MECT) for improved particle stopping power estimation in radiotherapy.
- To provide a comprehensive overview of existing DECT/MECT methods, their uncertainties, and clinical implementation aspects.
Main Methods:
- Review of various DECT and MECT methodologies proposed for particle stopping power estimation.
- Analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, and uncertainties associated with these advanced CT techniques.
- Discussion of factors influencing the clinical translation and implementation of DECT/MECT in radiotherapy planning.
Main Results:
- DECT has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing range uncertainty compared to SECT by providing additional material-specific information.
- MECT offers higher dimensionality of material-specific information, potentially further enhancing the accuracy of particle stopping power estimation.
- Despite proven benefits, DECT and MECT methods are not yet widely adopted in routine clinical practice.
Conclusions:
- Advanced imaging techniques like DECT and MECT hold significant promise for improving the accuracy of particle stopping power estimation in radiotherapy.
- Addressing uncertainties and practical implementation challenges is crucial for the broader clinical adoption of these technologies.
- Future applications of DECT/MECT extend beyond stopping power estimation, offering broader potential in radiotherapy.
More Related Videos
09:49A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
10:21Continuous Blood Sampling in Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Enables the Measurement of the Arterial Input Function
Published on: August 8, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Mass Analyzers: Common Types
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...
Electron Microscope Tomography and Single-particle Reconstruction
Electron Tomography
Electron tomography can be performed either in TEM or STEM (scanning transmission...
Double Resonance Techniques: Overview
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...