Continuous Vancomycin Infusion versus Intermittent Infusion in Critically Ill Patients
Chailat Maluangnon1, Surat Tongyoo1, Chairat Permpikul1
1Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Continuous vancomycin infusion (CVI) achieves therapeutic targets faster and reduces subtherapeutic levels compared to intermittent vancomycin infusion (IVI). CVI is superior for managing serious infections without increasing adverse events.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Infectious Diseases
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Vancomycin is crucial for treating methicillin-resistant staphylococcal and enterococcal infections, common in intensive care units (ICUs).
- Standard intermittent vancomycin infusion (IVI) faces challenges in achieving timely therapeutic drug levels.
- Continuous vancomycin infusion (CVI) is an alternative method proposed for improved therapeutic target achievement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical benefits of continuous vancomycin infusion (CVI) versus intermittent vancomycin infusion (IVI).
- To evaluate vancomycin efficacy and safety profiles between CVI and IVI in ICU patients.
Main Methods:
- A quasi-experimental study design utilizing propensity score-matched historical controls.
- Adult patients in medical and surgical ICUs receiving vancomycin for indicated infections were analyzed.
- Key outcomes included therapeutic target achievement, supra/subtherapeutic levels, treatment success, mortality, and acute kidney injury (AKI).
Main Results:
- Continuous vancomycin infusion (CVI) demonstrated significantly higher rates of achieving therapeutic targets within 48 hours compared to intermittent vancomycin infusion (IVI).
- CVI was associated with a lower incidence of subtherapeutic vancomycin levels, although supratherapeutic episodes were more frequent.
- Propensity score matching confirmed the superiority of CVI in rapid target attainment and reducing subtherapeutic levels, with no significant differences in treatment success, mortality, or AKI.
Conclusions:
- Continuous vancomycin infusion (CVI) offers advantages over intermittent vancomycin infusion (IVI) due to faster achievement of therapeutic drug levels and fewer subtherapeutic concentrations.
- The study found no significant differences in treatment success, patient mortality, or the incidence of acute kidney injury between the two infusion methods.
- CVI represents a potentially superior method for vancomycin administration in critical care settings, warranting consideration for optimizing patient outcomes.
More Related Videos
09:57A Protocol to Set Up Needle-Free Connector with Positive Displacement on Central Venous Catheter in Intensive Care Unit
Published on: July 13, 2019
09:17Use of a Central Venous Line for Fluids, Drugs and Nutrient Administration in a Mouse Model of Critical Illness
Published on: May 2, 2017
Related Concept Videos
One-Compartment Model: IV Infusion
The one-compartment model for IV infusion uses mathematical equations to describe the rate of change in drug quantity in the body. At steady-state or infusion equilibrium, the drug input...
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Two-Compartment Open Model: IV Infusion
The model illustrates the decrease in plasma drug concentration from the central compartment with a specific equation. It shows that under steady-state conditions, the drug's input rate...
One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: Estimation of Clearance
In the one-compartment open model for intravenous (IV) bolus administration, clearance is estimated by dividing the elimination rate by the plasma drug concentration. This equation leverages the elimination rate constant and the apparent...
Compartment Models: Single-Compartment Model
One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: General Considerations
The drug's presence in the body is defined by an equation representing the difference between the rates of drug entry and exit. Key parameters—elimination rate constant,...
