Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
The Use of Unilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery
Michael Morkos1, Aidan DeLeon1, Michael Koeckert2
1Department of Cardiovascular Anesthesiology, Texas Heart Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Continuous unilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks significantly reduced opioid consumption and hospital stays in minimally invasive cardiac surgery patients. This pain management technique offers improved postoperative recovery and reduced healthcare resource utilization.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology and Pain Management
- Cardiac Surgery
- Regional Anesthesia
Background:
- Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) requires effective postoperative pain management.
- Erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks are a regional anesthesia technique with potential benefits for thoracic and cardiac procedures.
- Optimizing pain control can lead to reduced opioid use and shorter hospital stays.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of continuous unilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in patients undergoing MICS.
- To compare postoperative outcomes, including opioid consumption and length of stay, between patients receiving ESP blocks and those receiving conventional care.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective, nonrandomized study involving 129 adult patients undergoing MICS.
- Patients received either ultrasound-guided ESP blocks with continuous ropivacaine infusion or conventional intraoperative management.
- Data on opioid consumption, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay were collected and compared.
Main Results:
- Patients receiving ESP blocks showed significantly decreased 48-hour opioid consumption (30.24 mg ± 23.8 vs. 47.82 mg ± 53.6, p=0.04).
- The ESP block group experienced a reduced length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) (1.99 days ± 1.7 vs. 2.65 days ± 2.4, p=0.03).
- Overall hospital length of stay was also significantly shorter in the ESP block group (5.93 days ± 2.4 vs. 7.35 days ± 5.8, p=0.04).
Conclusions:
- Continuous unilateral ESP blocks are a safe and effective adjunct for pain management in MICS patients.
- ESP blocks can lead to significant reductions in opioid requirements and hospital length of stay.
- This technique shows promise for improving postoperative recovery and resource utilization in cardiac surgery.
Related Concept Videos
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia

