Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2025

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm
Published on: May 4, 2020
Cognitive flexibility assessment in youth with Down syndrome: Reliability, practice effects, and validity
Emily K Schworer1, Amanallah Soltani2, Mekibib Altaye3
1Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA; University of Wisconsin-Madison, Waisman Center, Madison, WI, USA.
No current cognitive flexibility measures fully meet psychometric standards for individuals with Down syndrome (DS). Further research is needed to develop reliable tools for clinical trials and interventions in DS populations.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Developmental Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Cognitive flexibility, the ability to switch mental sets, is often impaired in individuals with Down syndrome (DS).
- Existing measures of cognitive flexibility lack the psychometric soundness needed for research in DS.
- Reliable measures are crucial for clinical trials and interventions targeting cognitive challenges in DS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the psychometric properties of three cognitive flexibility measures: Rule-Shift, Weigl Sorting, and KiTAP Flexibility.
- To assess the feasibility, reliability, and validity of these measures in youth with DS.
- To identify suitable cognitive flexibility assessments for use in research with the DS population.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated 97 youth with DS (aged 6-17) using Rule-Shift, Weigl Sorting, and KiTAP Flexibility.
- Collected data at two time points, two weeks apart, to assess test-retest reliability.
- Included parent questionnaires on adaptive behavior and cognitive flexibility, alongside child cognitive and language assessments.
Main Results:
- Weigl Sorting showed adequate feasibility but did not meet criteria for reliability and convergent validity.
- Rule-Shift and KiTAP Flexibility had insufficient feasibility for broad use.
- Rule-Shift showed potential utility for a subset of participants based on sensitivity and specificity.
Conclusions:
- None of the evaluated cognitive flexibility measures met all psychometric criteria for individuals with DS.
- Additional research and development are required to establish valid and reliable cognitive flexibility assessments for this population.
- Improved measures are essential for advancing clinical trials and interventions for cognitive challenges in Down syndrome.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...

