Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2025

11:21
Robotic Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: May 29, 2015
19.7K
Robotic Coronary Revascularization is Feasible and Safe: 10-year Single-Center Experience
Abdul Wahid Al-Mulla1, Hatem Hemdan Taha Sarhan1,2, Tamer Abdalghafoor1,2
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
Heart Views : the Official Journal of the Gulf Heart Association
|January 6, 2023
Summary
Robotic coronary revascularization, including total endoscopic (TECAB) and robotic-assisted minimally invasive direct (RA-MIDCAB) procedures, is safe and feasible for selected patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease. This approach requires specialized centers and trained surgeons for optimal outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery
- Robotic Surgery
Background:
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a standard treatment for coronary artery disease.
- Minimally invasive techniques aim to reduce surgical trauma and improve recovery.
- Robotic assistance enhances precision and dexterity in complex cardiac procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the outcomes of robotic surgical coronary revascularization.
- To compare total endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) and robotic-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (RA-MIDCAB).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective single-center study of 71 patients undergoing LIMA-to-LAD bypass using the da Vinci robotic system (2009-2020).
- Procedures included TECAB (robotic harvest and anastomosis) and RA-MIDCAB (robotic harvest, direct vision anastomosis).
- Data collected included preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes, complications, and 3-month follow-up.
Main Results:
- The majority of patients were male (90.14%) with a mean age of 31-70 years.
- TECAB was performed in 66.2% of patients; 73.2% of procedures were completed as planned.
- Low rates of complications (bleeding 2.8%, infection 4.29%) and 30-day mortality (2.8%) were observed, with a median hospital stay of 5 days.
Conclusions:
- Robotic coronary revascularization is safe and feasible in selected patients, particularly those with single-vessel disease.
- Successful implementation requires specialized centers and surgeons experienced in robotic cardiac surgery.
- Long-term outcomes and broader applicability warrant further investigation.

