Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cell-mediated Immune Responses01:40

Cell-mediated Immune Responses

69.6K
Overview
69.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biodegradable Acoustic Targeting for Ultrasound-Supported Gene Therapy (BATUS) in Glioblastoma.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
Same author

Lipid stress evolved, microbiome-based probiotics reduce lipid uptake in mice.

Bioengineering & translational medicine·2026
Same author

Polymer of methyl malonic acid suppress inflammation by downregulating IL-2 through ROS overproduction.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Delivery of Macrophage Activating Nanoparticles and Checkpoint Inhibitors Improves Melanoma Immunotherapy in Mice.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2025
Same author

Exponentially Decreasing Antigen Release Reduces Inflammatory Markers in an Antigen-Specific Manner.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A·2025
Same author

Immunosuppressive Formulations for Immunological Defense against Traumatic Brain Injury.

Advanced healthcare materials·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 15, 2025

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo
12:19

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo

Published on: July 1, 2013

11.0K

Immune response differences in degradable and non-degradable alloy implants.

Taravat Khodaei1, Elizabeth Schmitzer1, Abhirami P Suresh2

  • 1Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological and Health System Engineering, Arizona State, University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.

Bioactive Materials
|January 6, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Degradable alloy implants may trigger significant immune responses, unlike their non-degradable counterparts. Further research is crucial to understand these immune reactions for safe clinical use of degradable implants.

More Related Videos

Direct and Indirect Culture Methods for Studying Biodegradable Implant Materials In Vitro
14:49

Direct and Indirect Culture Methods for Studying Biodegradable Implant Materials In Vitro

Published on: April 15, 2022

5.2K
Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
10:28

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

12.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 15, 2025

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo
12:19

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo

Published on: July 1, 2013

11.0K
Direct and Indirect Culture Methods for Studying Biodegradable Implant Materials In Vitro
14:49

Direct and Indirect Culture Methods for Studying Biodegradable Implant Materials In Vitro

Published on: April 15, 2022

5.2K
Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
10:28

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

12.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Immunology
  • Medical Device Research

Background:

  • Alloy implants are widely used in clinical and preclinical settings.
  • Immune responses are a primary cause of alloy implant failure.
  • Immune responses to degradable alloy implants are poorly understood compared to non-degradable ones.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent findings on immune responses to degradable alloy implants.
  • To compare immune responses between degradable and non-degradable implants.
  • To identify research gaps and future directions in understanding degradable implant immunogenicity.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of recent reports on degradable implant immunology.
  • Comparative analysis of immune responses to degradable versus non-degradable implants.
  • Discussion of the roles of innate and adaptive immune cells.

Main Results:

  • Emerging evidence suggests degradable implants can elicit substantial immune responses.
  • Innate and potentially adaptive immune cells may drive these responses.
  • Understanding these responses is critical for clinical translation.

Conclusions:

  • Degradable alloy implants present unique immunological challenges.
  • Further detailed investigation into local and systemic immune responses is necessary.
  • This knowledge will guide the safe and effective clinical application of degradable implants.