Cingulo-Opercular Subnetworks Motivate Frontoparietal Subnetworks during Distinct Cognitive Control Demands

Cognitive control is the ability to flexibly adapt behavior in a goal-directed manner when habit will not suffice. Control can be separated into distinct forms based on the timescale (present-future) and/or medium (external-internal) over which it operates. Both the frontoparietal network (FPN) and cingulo-opercular network (CON) are engaged during control, but their respective functions and interactions remain unclear. Here, we examined activations in the FPN and CON with fMRI in humans (male and female) during a task that manipulated control across timescales/mediums. The findings show that the CON can be distinguished into the following two separable subnetworks mirroring the FPN: a rostral/ventral subnetwork sensitive to future-oriented control involving internal representations, and a caudal/dorsal subnetwork sensitive to present-oriented control involving external representations. Relative to the FPN, activation in the CON was particularly pronounced during transitions into and out of particular control demands. Moreover, the relationship of each CON subnetwork to behavior was mediated by a respective FPN subnetwork. Such data are consistent with the idea that the CON motivates the FPN, which, in turn, drives behavior. Within the CON, the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) mediated the relationship between the anterior insula and FPN, suggesting that the dmPFC acts as the crux that links the CON to the FPN. Collectively, these data indicate that parallel CON-FPN subnetworks mediate controlled behaviors at distinct timescales/mediums.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The cingulo-opercular network (CON) and frontoparietal network (FPN) are engaged in diverse, demanding tasks. A functional model describing how areas within these networks can be distinguished, and also interact, would facilitate understanding of how the brain adapts to demanding situations. During a comprehensive control task, fMRI data revealed that the FPN and CON can be fractionated into subnetworks based on control demands that are either externally oriented for use in the present, or control demands that operate internally to guide future behavior. Moreover, we found evidence for a chain of relationships from the CON to FPN to behavior consistent with the idea that the CON drives the FPN to adapt behavior.