Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2025

09:26
Disruption of Frontal Lobe Neural Synchrony During Cognitive Control by Alcohol Intoxication
Published on: February 6, 2019
18.8K
Proactive Interhemispheric Disinhibition Supports Response Preparation during Selective Stopping
Corey G Wadsley1,2, John Cirillo1,2, Arne Nieuwenhuys1
1Movement Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Exercise Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Summary
Proactive cueing improves selective response inhibition, reducing interference between hands. Interhemispheric motor cortex pathways modulate inhibitory tone during preparation but do not directly support proactive stopping.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Motor Control
- Cognitive Psychology
Background:
- Response inhibition is crucial for halting unwanted actions.
- Stopping only part of a bimanual action can cause delays in the non-stopped limb (stopping-interference).
- Proactive cueing can mitigate this interference, suggesting improved selective control.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of interhemispheric primary motor cortex (M1-M1) communication in selective response inhibition with proactive cueing.
- To test the hypothesis that increased stopping certainty, cued proactively, reduces stopping-interference via interhemispheric modulation.
Main Methods:
- Twenty-three participants performed a bimanual response inhibition task with varying stop-signal likelihood cues.
- Dual-coil transcranial magnetic stimulation assessed corticomotor excitability (CME), interhemispheric inhibition (IHI), and facilitation (IHF) in the left primary motor cortex.
- Measurements were taken at rest and during response preparation.
Main Results:
- Stopping-interference decreased as stopping certainty increased.
- Proactive inhibition involved faster electromyographical cancel times.
- Interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) was released during response preparation, but not CME. An effector-specific CME reduction occurred when one hand was cued to stop, without IHI reinstatement.
Conclusions:
- Proactive cueing enhances stopping speed and selectivity in bimanual actions.
- Interhemispheric M1-M1 pathways adjust inhibitory tone for response preparation but are not directly engaged in proactive stopping.
- Improvements in selective stopping with cues do not appear to rely on advance engagement of interhemispheric motor cortex influences.
Keywords:
humanprimary motor cortexresponse inhibitionresponse preparationselective stoppingtranscranial magnetic stimulation
