Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Survival Curves01:18

Survival Curves

244
Survival curves are graphical representations that depict the survival experience of a population over time, offering an intuitive way to track the proportion of individuals who remain event-free at each time point. These curves are widely used in fields such as medicine, public health, and reliability engineering to visualize and compare survival probabilities across different groups or conditions.
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
244
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

131
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
131
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

184
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
184
Introduction To Survival Analysis01:18

Introduction To Survival Analysis

332
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to study time-to-event data, where the "event" might represent outcomes like death, disease relapse, system failure, or recovery. A unique feature of survival data is censoring, which occurs when the event of interest has not been observed for some individuals during the study period. This requires specialized techniques to handle incomplete data effectively.
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
332
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

411
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
411
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

172
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
172

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A systematic review of in vivo brain insulin resistance biomarkers in humans.

Biomarkers in neuropsychiatry·2026
Same author

The relationship between renin-angiotensin system-modulating medication and depression: a systematic review.

Translational psychiatry·2026
Same author

Associations of plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease pathology with modifiable risk factors and cognitive and functional outcomes: evidence from cross-sectional prediction and latent path analyses in the Bio-Hermes-001 cohort.

Alzheimer's research & therapy·2026
Same author

The dynamic interplay between mental health difficulties and the family environment in early adolescence.

JCPP advances·2026
Same author

Predicting Change in Brief Treatment for BPD: The Role of Defensive Functioning and Pervasiveness in Relationship Patterns.

Journal of clinical psychology·2026
Same author

Residential mobility and receipt of measles, mumps and rubella vaccination: analysis of linked primary care electronic health records in a London region.

International journal of population data science·2026
Same journal

Re: "Does tattoo exposure increase the risk of cutaneous melanoma? A population-based case-control study".

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Separability and identifiability as primary obstacles to substantively useful mediation analysis.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Intergenerational income mobility and psychotropic drug dispensation in a 1953 Stockholm cohort: a diagonal reference model approach.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Genetic risk score to enhance glaucoma case detection: a prospective double-blind screening study (EyeLife) in the population-based Lifelines cohort.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Different risks, same causes: educational attainment influences when, not from what, we die.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Loneliness around the world: patterns, predictors, and well-being implications.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 15, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Research-ready data: the C-Surv data model.

Sarah Bauermeister1, Joshua R Bauermeister1, Ruth Bridgman1

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

European Journal of Epidemiology
|January 7, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Standardizing research data with the C-Surv data model enhances scientific discovery and rigor. This approach streamlines multi-cohort analyses, making research-ready data more accessible and efficient for researchers.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

325

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 15, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

325

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Informatics
  • Data Science
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Research-ready data are crucial for scientific opportunity and rigor.
  • Multi-cohort analyses benefit significantly from integrated data environments.
  • Developing standardized data models enhances data discovery and integration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a standard data model (C-Surv) optimized for data discovery.
  • To harmonize data from multiple population and clinical cohort studies.
  • To evaluate the efficiency of the C-Surv model compared to cohort-specific data models.

Main Methods:

  • Stakeholder consultation informed the development of the C-Surv model.
  • A four-tier nested structure was implemented with 18 data themes.
  • Standard variable naming conventions were applied for longitudinal studies.
  • A harmonized dataset was created for 11 cohorts using the C-Surv model.

Main Results:

  • The C-Surv model facilitated the creation of a harmonized dataset for 11 cohorts.
  • The Cohort Explorer tool was populated, enabling pre-access analysis feasibility assessments.
  • Data preparation times were reduced compared to cohort-specific data models.

Conclusions:

  • Adopting a common data model like C-Surv serves as a valuable data standard.
  • This standardization offers multiple benefits for the discovery and analysis of research cohort data.
  • The C-Surv model improves efficiency and rigor in multi-cohort research.