Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

525
Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
525
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

172
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
172
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

270
Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
270
Introduction To Survival Analysis01:18

Introduction To Survival Analysis

332
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to study time-to-event data, where the "event" might represent outcomes like death, disease relapse, system failure, or recovery. A unique feature of survival data is censoring, which occurs when the event of interest has not been observed for some individuals during the study period. This requires specialized techniques to handle incomplete data effectively.
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
332
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

247
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
247
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

184
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
184

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pregnancy intentions by sexual orientation among pregnancies across the life course.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Social network characteristics and cognitive function, decline, and mortality: A joint modeling approach.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Fathers' adverse childhood experiences and children's behavior problems.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026
Same author

Circulating imidazole propionate and coronary heart disease risk: interplay between histidine intake, fiber, and gut microbiome.

BMC medicine·2026
Same author

Inference for Stationary Log-Gaussian Cox Point Processes using Bayesian Deep Learning: Application to Human Oral Microbiome Image Data.

Spatial statistics·2026
Same author

Improvements in Cogstate Test Performance Depend on Number and Frequency of Prior Tests: Evidence from a Randomized Follow-Up Design.

Alzheimer disease and associated disorders·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 15, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K

Characterizing quantile-varying covariate effects under the accelerated failure time model.

Harrison T Reeder1, Kyu Ha Lee2, Sebastien Haneuse3

  • 1Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, Suite 560, Boston, MA 02114, USA and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)
|January 7, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new framework for survival analysis, allowing covariate effects to vary across survival quantiles in accelerated failure time (AFT) models. This improves the analysis of time-to-event data, particularly for complex outcomes like Alzheimer's disease progression.

Keywords:
Accelerated failure time modelBayesian survival analysisLeft truncationTime-varying coefficientsTime-varying covariates

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
05:16

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

Published on: June 10, 2025

174

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 15, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
05:16

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

Published on: June 10, 2025

174

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Survival Analysis
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Survival analysis models relationships between covariates and time-to-event outcomes.
  • Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) models assume constant covariate effects across survival quantiles.
  • Existing models may fail to capture quantile-specific effects, similar to limitations in Cox proportional hazards models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a general framework for quantile-varying multiplicative effects within the AFT model.
  • To develop interpretable effect measures on the quantile scale.
  • To enable estimation of covariate-conditional and marginal effects using a regression standardization approach.

Main Methods:

  • Embedding flexible regression structures within the AFT model.
  • Deriving a novel formula for quantile-specific effects.
  • Utilizing a g-formula-based regression standardization for effect estimation.
  • Implementing a Bayesian approach for estimation and uncertainty quantification.
  • Accounting for left truncation and complex censoring.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework allows for flexible modeling of covariate effects across survival quantiles.
  • A novel formula provides interpretable effects on the quantile scale.
  • The Bayesian approach effectively estimates effects and quantifies uncertainty.
  • The method is illustrated through simulations and application to Alzheimer's disease data.

Conclusions:

  • The developed framework extends the AFT model to accommodate quantile-varying effects.
  • This approach offers a more nuanced understanding of covariate impacts on survival.
  • The user-friendly Bayesian implementation facilitates practical application in biostatistics and epidemiology.
  • The methodology is valuable for analyzing complex time-to-event data, including disease progression studies.