Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2025
Enhancing the Development and Growth of Infant Cerebral Palsy Rats Using Selective Spinal Manipulations
Published on: February 2, 2024
Deep brain stimulation effect in genetic dyskinetic cerebral palsy: The case of ADCY5- related disease
Laura Cif1, Diane Demailly1, Claire Gehin1
1Department of Neurosurgery, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
Background:
Cerebral Palsy (CP) represents a frequent cause of disability in childhood. Early in life, genetic disorders may present with motor dysfunction and diagnosed as CP. Establishing the primary, genetic etiology allows more accurate prognosis, genetic counselling, and planning for symptomatic interventions in homogeneous etiological groups. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is recommended in refractory movement disorders, including isolated pediatric dystonias. For dystonia evolving in more complex associations in genetic CP, the effect of DBS is still understudied and currently only sporadically described.
Objectives:
To report the effect of DBS applied to the globus pallidus pars interna (GPi) in children with complex movement disorders caused by pathogenic ADCY5 variants, diagnosed as dyskinetic CP previous to genetic diagnostic.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective study on evolution of treatment with DBS in ADCY5-related disease. A standardized proforma including the different type of movement disorders and associated neurological signs was completed at each follow-up time, based on video recordings, as well as functional assessments used in children with CP.
Results:
Four children (mean of age, 13 ± 2.9 years) received GPi-DBS. The same de novo pathogenic missense variant (c.1252C > T, p.R418W) was identified in three out of four and a splice site variant (c.2088 + 2G > T) in one subject. Developmental delay and overlapping features including axial hypotonia, chorea, dystonic attacks, myoclonus, and cranial dyskinesia were present. The median age at DBS was 9 years and follow-up with DBS, 2.6 years. We identified a pattern of clinical response with early suppression of dystonic attacks, followed by improvement of myoclonus and facial dyskinesia. Effect on chorea was delayed and more limited. Two patients gained notable functional benefit related to sitting, standing, gait, use of upper limbs and speech.
Conclusion:
ADCY5-related disease may benefit from GPi-DBS. The most significant clinical response relates to the early and sustained benefit on dystonic attacks and a variable but still positive response on the other hyperkinetic features. Genetic etiology of CP will contribute to further elucidate genotype-phenotype correlations and to refine DBS indication as network-related symptomatic interventions.
