Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

230
Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
230
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

174
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
174
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

156
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
156
Introduction to Statistical Process Control01:15

Introduction to Statistical Process Control

210
Statistical Process Control (SPC) is a method used to monitor and control quality within processes, particularly in manufacturing and service delivery, by employing statistical methods. SPC aims to distinguish between natural (common cause) variation and variation due to specific changes or events (special cause), allowing for timely improvements and sustained quality. The control chart, a pivotal tool in SPC, visually displays data over time alongside a central line of upper and lower control...
210
The R Chart01:02

The R Chart

122
In statistical process control, control charts, particularly R charts, are instrumental in monitoring process variations and identifying non-random patterns that run charts might miss. R charts track the variability within process subgroups, which is crucial when standard deviation use is impractical or unknown process variations exist.
R charts are pivotal for pinpointing shifts in process variability. Stability is indicated when all data points remain within the defined upper and lower...
122
Interpreting R Charts01:22

Interpreting R Charts

98
R chart, or range chart, is a fundamental tool in statistical process control used to monitor the variability within a process. It complements the X-bar (x̄) chart by focusing on the range of the data, rather than individual values, providing a clear picture of the process dispersion over time.
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum...
98

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Immunalysis tapentadol assay reformulation resolves tramadol interference.

Journal of analytical toxicology·2025
Same author

On-Cell Stability of Digoxin, Lithium, Phenytoin, Valproic Acid, and Vancomycin for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

The journal of applied laboratory medicine·2025
Same author

Alkaline Phosphatase Activity Inconsistent with Patient's Clinical Presentation: A Cautionary Tale.

Clinical chemistry·2024
Same author

Rainbow phlebotomy collection and urine aliquots for emergency department add-on testing in the era of pandemic-driven supply shortages.

Laboratory medicine·2024
Same author

The incidence of transfusion-related acute lung injury using active surveillance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Transfusion·2023
Same author

Meta-analysis of bacterial growth characteristics in platelet components: Refining the inputs of a simulation analysis comparing the relative safety of testing strategies.

Transfusion·2023
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 15, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Risk Analysis for Quality Control Part 2: Theoretical Foundations for Risk Analysis.

Ryleigh A Moore1, Joseph W Rudolf2,3, Robert L Schmidt2,3

  • 1Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
|January 7, 2023
PubMed
Summary

A new dynamic Markov Reward Model improves risk analysis for laboratory quality control (QC). This model optimizes QC settings to reduce patient risk from errors while minimizing laboratory costs associated with false-positive QC results.

Keywords:
Markov processanalyticsmathematical modelingquality controlrandom systemsriskstochastic process

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
09:30

Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies

Published on: March 17, 2023

3.6K
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 15, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
09:30

Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies

Published on: March 17, 2023

3.6K
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.8K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical diagnostics
  • Laboratory medicine
  • Risk management

Background:

  • Traditional risk analysis for quality control (QC), like the Parvin model, has limitations.
  • The Parvin model can yield paradoxical results and underestimate risks in QC settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an improved framework for risk analysis in laboratory quality control.
  • To create a dynamic model that accurately assesses long-term assay behavior under QC monitoring.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a dynamic Markov Reward Model to simulate assay behavior over time.
  • The model incorporates assay shift frequency, shift distribution, and error impact on patient outcomes.
  • Analyzed competing risks, including false detections and mean shifts, leading to out-of-control states.

Main Results:

  • The model generates a tradeoff curve balancing patient risk reduction against laboratory costs (false-positive QC).
  • It quantifies undetected reported errors and false-positive laboratory results based on QC settings.
  • Provides a method to optimize specific QC strategies or compare different QC approaches.

Conclusions:

  • A novel method was developed to evaluate the cost of reducing patient risk from unacceptable errors.
  • This framework quantifies the trade-off between patient safety and laboratory operational costs.
  • The dynamic model offers a more robust approach to risk analysis in quality control settings.