Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2025

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
Published on: November 2, 2013
How the Analysis of the Pathogenetic Variants of DDR Genes Will Change the Management of Prostate Cancer Patients
Alessandro Sciarra1, Marco Frisenda1, Giulio Bevilacqua1
1Department "Materno Infantile e Scienze Urologiche", University Sapienza, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Abstract:
Herein, we analyze answers achieved, open questions, and future perspectives regarding the analysis of the pathogenetic variants (PV) of DNA damage response (and repair) (DDR) genes in prostate cancer (PC) patients. The incidence of PVs in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes among men with metastatic PC varied between 11% and 33%, which was significantly higher than that in non-metastatic PC, and BRCA2 mutations were more frequent when compared to other DDR genes. The determination of the somatic or germline PVs of BRCA2 was able to define a tailored therapy using PARP inhibitors in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progression after first-line therapy, with significant improvements in the radiologic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. We propose testing all metastatic PC patients for somatic and germline HRR mutations. Somatic determination on the primary site or on historic paraffin preparations with a temporal distance of no longer than 5 years should be preferred over metastatic site biopsies. The prognostic use of DDR PVs will also be used in selected high-risk cases with non-metastatic stages to better arrange controls and therapeutic primary options. We anticipate that the use of poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) and in combination with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) will be new strategies.
Insights
Testing for DNA damage response gene variants in prostate cancer patients can guide tailored therapies. Identifying these variants, especially in BRCA2, improves outcomes for metastatic disease and aids in risk stratification for earlier stages.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Prostate cancer (PC) prognosis and treatment can be influenced by genetic alterations.
- DNA damage response (DDR) and repair (DDR) gene pathogenetic variants (PVs) are implicated in PC development and progression.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze current findings, open questions, and future directions regarding DDR gene PVs in prostate cancer.
- To evaluate the clinical utility of identifying DDR gene PVs for therapeutic decisions and prognostic assessment.
Main Methods:
- Review and analysis of existing literature on DDR gene PVs in prostate cancer.
- Correlation of PV incidence with disease stage (metastatic vs. non-metastatic).
- Assessment of therapeutic responses to PARP inhibitors based on specific gene mutations.
Main Results:
- Higher incidence of PVs in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes in metastatic PC (11-33%) compared to non-metastatic PC.
- BRCA2 mutations were more frequent than other DDR gene mutations in metastatic PC.
- Somatic or germline BRCA2 PVs enabled tailored therapy with PARP inhibitors in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), improving radiologic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS).
Conclusions:
- Testing all metastatic PC patients for somatic and germline HRR mutations is proposed.
- Somatic testing on primary or historic samples (within 5 years) is preferred over metastatic biopsies.
- DDR PVs have prognostic value for high-risk non-metastatic PC, aiding in management and treatment planning.
- Future strategies include using poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) and combination therapies with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI).
More Related Videos
04:07Visualizing DNA Damage Repair Proteins in Patient-Derived Ovarian Cancer Organoids via Immunofluorescence Assays
Published on: February 24, 2023
07:15Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
Published on: January 16, 2019