Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2025

Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management
Published on: March 15, 2024
Ranirestat Improves Electrophysiologic but not Clinical Measures of Diabetic Polyneuropathy: A Meta-Analysis
Deep Dutta1, Ritin Mohindra2, Manoj Kumar3
1Department of Endocrinology, Center for Endocrinology, Diabetes, Arthritis and Rheumatism (CEDAR) Super-Speciality Healthcare, Dwarka, New Delhi, India.
Abstract:
Ranirestat, an aldose reductase inhibitor evaluated in several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). However, to date, no meta-analysis has evaluated the efficacy and safety of ranirestat in DPN. We undertook this meta-analysis to address this knowledge gap. Detailed search of electronic databases for RCTs published till December 2021 was done at Cochrane register, Medline, PubMed, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov, ctri.nic.in, global health and Google Scholar using the Boolean search strategy: ((ranirestat) OR (aldose reductase inhibitor)) AND ((diabetes) OR ("diabetes mellitus")). The primary outcome was to evaluate changes in nerve conduction velocities (NCV) of different nerves. The secondary outcomes were to evaluate alterations in amplitudes, F-wave latencies of nerves, modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (mTCNS) and adverse events. Data from 5 studies involving 1461 patients with DPN was analysed to establish the impact of ranirestat (20-40 mg/day) as compared to placebo on different electrophysiologic outcomes over a median follow-up of 52 weeks. Patients receiving ranirestat had significantly greater improvement in proximal median sensory NCV [MD 0.77 m/s (95%CI: 0.50-1.05); P < 0.01; I2 = 26%], distal median sensory NCV [MD 0.91 m/s (95%CI: 0.87-0.95); P < 0.01; I2 = 0%], median motor NCV [MD 0.63 m/s (95%CI: 0.60-0.66); P < 0.01; I2 = 0%], tibial motor NCV [MD 0.46 m/s (95%CI: 0.43-0.49); P < 0.01; I2 = 0%] and peroneal motor NCV [MD 0.80 m/s (95%CI: 0.66-0.93); P < 0.01; I2 = 0%]. mTCNS was not significantly different among groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events [risk ratio (RR) 0.85 (95%CI: 0.63-1.14); P = 0.28; I2 = 0%] and severe adverse events [RR 1.35 (95%CI: 0.86-2.11); P = 0.20; I2 = 0%] were comparable across study groups. In people with established DPN with long-standing diabetes, ranirestat is safe and effective in improving electrophysiologic but not clinical DPN.
More Related Videos
05:58Mouse Electroacupuncture Fixation Device Fabrication for Electroacupuncture Pretreatment in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy Mouse Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
07:30The Muscle Cuff Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface for the Amplification of Intact Peripheral Nerve Signals
Published on: January 13, 2022