Cardiac sequelae after COVID-19: Results of a 1-year follow-up study with echocardiography and biomarkers
Gabriela Matejova1,2, Martin Radvan1,2, Elis Bartecku2,3
1Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.
Insights
This study found no increased risk of significant heart complications in patients one year after COVID-19 recovery. Routine cardiac monitoring is not recommended post-infection.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Public Health
Background:
- COVID-19 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) can potentially affect the cardiovascular system.
- Understanding long-term cardiac implications in recovered patients is crucial for clinical management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the need for cardiac monitoring in unselected patients after COVID-19 recovery.
- To estimate the risk of heart complications following SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Main Methods:
- A prospective observational cohort study (CoSuBr) involving 106 patients recovered from SARS-CoV-2.
- Data collection included demographics, medical history, clinical evaluation, cardiac biomarkers, ECG, and echocardiography over a 1-year follow-up.
- Patients underwent three visits: at least 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year post-infection.
Main Results:
- No significant decrease in left ventricle ejection fraction or changes in troponin/NT-proBNP levels were observed over 1 year.
- Mild changes noted in right ventricle end-diastolic diameter and left ventricle diastolic diameter, without detected dysfunction.
- A mild increase in left atrium size and pulmonary artery systolic pressure were recorded, with a non-significant trend towards diastolic dysfunction.
Conclusions:
- The study indicates no increased risk for clinically significant heart changes in the 1-year period following COVID-19 recovery.
- Routine echocardiography and cardiac biomarker testing are not currently recommended for all recovered COVID-19 patients.
Objective:
To evaluate the need for cardiac monitoring in unselected patients recovered from COVID-19 and to estimate the risk of heart complications after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
Materials And Methods:
During March 2020 and January 2021, 106 patients who had recovered from SARS-CoV-2 (alpha and beta variants) were enrolled in prospective observational cohort study CoSuBr (Covid Survivals in Brno). The diagnosis was based on a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction swab test of the upper respiratory tract. Demographic parameters, patient history, clinical evaluation, cardiac biomarkers, ECG and echocardiography were recorded during three visits (Visit 1 at least 6 weeks after infection, Visit 2 three months later, and Visit 3 one year after Visit 1).
Results:
58.5% of the study group (n = 106) were female, while the mean age was 46 years (range 18-77 years). The mean time interval between the onset of infection and the follow-up visit was 107 days. One quarter (24.5%) of the patients required hospitalization during the acute phase of the disease; the rest recovered at home. 74% suffered a mild form of the disease, with 4.8, 18.1, and 2.9% suffering moderate, severe, and critical forms, respectively. At the time of enrolment, 64.2% of the patients reported persistent symptoms, while more than half of the whole group (50.9%) mentioned at least one symptom of possible cardiac origin (breathing problems, palpitations, exercise intolerance, fatigue). In the 1-year follow-up after COVID-19 infection, left ventricle ejection fraction showed no significant decrease [median (IQR) change was -1.0 (-6.0; 4.0)%, p = 0.150], and there were no changes of troponin (mean change -0.1 ± 1.72 ng/L; p = 0.380) or NT-proBNP [median (IQR) change 2.0 (-20.0; 29.0) pg/mL; p = 0.315]. There was a mild decrease in right ventricle end diastolic diameter (-mean change 2.3 ± 5.61 mm, p < 0.001), while no right ventricle dysfunction was detected. There was very mild progress in left ventricle diastolic diameter [median (IQR) change 1.0 (-1.0; 4.0) mm; p = 0.001] between V1 and V3, mild enlargement of the left atrium (mean change 1.2 ± 4.17 mm; p = 0.021) and a non-significant trend to impairment of left ventricle diastolic dysfunction. There was a mild change in pulmonary artery systolic pressure [median (IQR) change 3.0 (-2.0; 8.0) mmHg; p = 0.038].
Conclusion:
Despite a lot of information regarding cardiac impairment due to SARS-CoV2, our study does not suggest an increased risk for developing clinically significant heart changes during the 1-year follow-up. Based on our results, routine echocardiography and biomarkers collection is currently not recommended after COVID-19 recovery.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion,...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for...


