Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2025
Clinical Assessment of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in Patients and Older Adults
Published on: November 7, 2014
The contribution of walking speed versus recent stroke to temporospatial gait variability
John W Chow1, Dobrivoje S Stokic1
1Center for Neuroscience and Neurological Recovery, Methodist Rehabilitation Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
Background:
Inconsistent results have been reported for temporospatial gait variability after stroke. Given the large differences in gait speed across stroke subjects and relative to healthy controls, it is not clear which changes in temporospatial gait variability can be ascribed to the walking speed during gait evaluation versus the consequences of stroke.
Research Questions:
Does temporospatial gait variability differ between (1) stroke subjects grouped in clinically-relevant functional ambulation classes, (2) the paretic and non-paretic legs within each class, and (3) stroke and healthy subjects after controlling for gait speed?
Methods:
Stroke subjects were evaluated at their comfortable speed < 2 months post-onset and classified into the household (<40 cm/s, n = 38), limited-community (40-80 cm/s, n = 35), and full-community (>80 cm/s, n = 14) walkers. Coefficients of variation (CVs) for paretic and non-paretic stance, initial double-support, and single-support times, step length, step cadence, and step width were compared across the stroke ambulation classes and between the two legs. For the parameters with significantly different CVs between stroke subjects and 33 age-matched controls walking at very-slow and free speeds, a 1-way ANCOVA was used with the gait speed as a covariate.
Results:
For most step parameters, CVs were greater in slower stroke ambulation classes except for the smaller step width CV. The differences between the paretic and non-paretic legs emerged in slower walkers only. After controlling for the gait speed, CVs of stroke subjects no longer significantly differed from controls walking at very-slow speed. With controls walking at free speed, however, CVs for the paretic and non-paretic single-support times and the non-paretic step time remained significantly different.
Significance:
Gait is more variable at slower speeds both in stroke subjects and healthy controls. After accounting for the free gait speed, the increased variability of only a few temporal parameters may be attributed to a recent stroke.
