Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2025

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
Intra- and interobserver variability of novel magnetic resonance imaging parameters for hip screening and treatment
A Graham Wilkinson1, Sally Wilkinson2, Robert A Elton3
1Department of Radiology, The Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, 50 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK. agraham.wilkinson@gmail.com.
Insights
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without sedation is feasible for neonatal hip screening at age 5. Specific lateral acetabular parameters may offer better insights into hip joint development than traditional indices.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric orthopedics
- Diagnostic imaging
Background:
- Neonatal hip screening commonly uses the radiographic acetabular index.
- Assessing hip development requires reliable outcome measures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without sedation for neonatal hip screening.
- To compare the utility of various outcome parameters derived from MRI.
Main Methods:
- MRI scans were performed on children at 5 years of age as part of their follow-up.
- Diagnostic images were successfully obtained in 132 out of 134 children.
- Multiple hip joint parameters were measured, including osseous and cartilaginous acetabular indices and lateral acetabular roof measurements.
Main Results:
- MRI without sedation was feasible in the majority of children.
- While observer variation was higher for lateral acetabular roof measures, they showed a significant negative correlation with the age at treatment onset.
- Osseous and cartilaginous acetabular indices did not show significant correlation with treatment onset age.
Conclusions:
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without sedation is a viable outcome measure for hip screening programs at age 5.
- Measures of the lateral acetabulum may provide more sensitive indicators of acetabular development compared to traditional indices, despite increased observer variability.
Background:
The outcome measure of neonatal hip screening is usually the radiographic acetabular index.
Objective:
To assess the feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without sedation and compare the utility of outcome parameters measured from MRI images.
Materials And Methods:
The invitation for MRI scanning at 5 years of age was incorporated into follow-up for babies who had more than one ultrasound examination during treatment or surveillance.
Results:
Diagnostic images were obtained in 132 of 134 children. The mean osseous acetabular index (standard deviation [SD]) was 16.6 (3.3) degrees for the right hip and 17.8 (3.2) for the left; the values for the cartilaginous acetabular index were 3.1 (3) and 3.4 (3.2). The mean downslope of a tangent to the lateral bony acetabular roof was 10.4 (4.5) and 9.0 (4.3) with respect to Hilgenreiner's line and that of a line drawn through the apex to the margin of the acetabulum was 3.7 (4.6) and 3.9 (4.7). Intra- and interobserver variation was greater for measures specific to the lateral acetabular roof than for ossific and cartilaginous indices. There was significant negative correlation between the downslope of the tangent to the lateral roof index and the age at onset of treatment on both sides, but no significant correlation for ossific or cartilaginous acetabular indices or apex-marginal index.
Conclusion:
MRI without sedation at 5 years of age is feasible as an outcome measure for hip screening programmes. Parameters specific to the lateral acetabulum may better reflect acetabular sufficiency, despite having greater observer variation than cartilaginous and ossific acetabular indices.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...

