Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

411
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
411

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Incidence Rates of Melanoma and Lung Cancer Are Generally Low in the Lynch Syndromes and Vary Across <i>path_MMR</i> Variants: A Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database Report.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Sedentary behaviour and cancer risk: a World Cancer Research Fund International Global Cancer Update Programme (CUP Global) systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Sugar sweetened and artificially sweetened beverages, fruit and vegetable juices and cancer risk: a World Cancer Research Fund International Global Cancer Update Programme (CUP Global) systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same authorSame journal

Evaluation of the 4Kscore in EPIC: Reply.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026
Same author

A deep learning framework for efficient pathology image analysis.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Evaluating statistical models for overdispersed multi-omics data: a multiplex immunofluorescence case study.

American journal of epidemiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 14, 2025

A Genetically Engineered Mouse Model of Sporadic Colorectal Cancer
06:01

A Genetically Engineered Mouse Model of Sporadic Colorectal Cancer

Published on: July 6, 2017

9.6K

Validation of a Genetic-Enhanced Risk Prediction Model for Colorectal Cancer in a Large Community-Based Cohort.

Yu-Ru Su1,2, Lori C Sakoda2,3,4, Jihyoun Jeon5

  • 1Biostatistics Unit, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention : a Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology
|January 9, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) enhance colorectal cancer risk prediction. External validation shows the PRS-enhanced model improves accuracy and aids in targeted screening strategies for better prevention.

More Related Videos

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

322
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

172

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 14, 2025

A Genetically Engineered Mouse Model of Sporadic Colorectal Cancer
06:01

A Genetically Engineered Mouse Model of Sporadic Colorectal Cancer

Published on: July 6, 2017

9.6K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

322
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

172

Area of Science:

  • Genetics and Genomics
  • Cancer Epidemiology
  • Preventive Medicine

Background:

  • Polygenic risk scores (PRS) can summarize genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer (CRC).
  • External validation of PRS-enhanced CRC risk models in large cohorts is crucial for clinical implementation.
  • This study assessed a PRS-enhanced CRC risk model using 140 CRC loci.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To externally validate a PRS-enhanced colorectal cancer risk model.
  • To assess the model's prediction performance, including calibration and discriminatory accuracy.
  • To evaluate the impact of PRS on risk prediction in different age groups.

Main Methods:

  • The PRS model was developed in 20,338 individuals and validated in a 85,221-person community cohort.
  • 5-year absolute CRC risk was validated using calibration (E/O ratios) and discrimination (time-dependent AUC).
  • PRS impact on AUC, sensitivity, and specificity was assessed in screening-eligible (45-74 yrs) and younger (40-49 yrs) age groups.

Main Results:

  • The PRS-enhanced model demonstrated good calibration (E/O=1.01) and high discriminatory accuracy (AUC=0.73) in European-ancestry individuals.
  • Adding PRS improved 5-year AUC by 0.06 in screening-eligible and 0.14 in younger individuals.
  • PRS improved specificity by 11% in screening-eligible and sensitivity by 27% in younger individuals.

Conclusions:

  • The PRS-enhanced model offers well-calibrated 5-year CRC risk prediction.
  • The model significantly improves discriminatory accuracy in an external validation cohort.
  • This PRS-enhanced model shows potential for risk-stratified colorectal cancer prevention strategies.